On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:11:09 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Do you add extra headers by any chance? I do, because the main group
> I'm on is self-moderated.
Nope, no extra headers.
Jim
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.o
On 05/20/2008 Duncan wrote:
Well, the cat line is about the simplest executable solution you
could
get, so at least for a test, try it and see if it dups that.
Similarly,
you can try a text file (what I'm using with no problem) and see if
it
dups that.
OK! Gotcha! Using cat /home/joe/Do
Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 May 2008 16:11:59
-0700:
> Using cat isn't acceptable, because that means I only have one sig, not
> the hundred or more I've moved over from Windows. (You'd be amazed how
> many quotes you can find when you've be
On Tue 20 May 2008 at 16:11:59 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> goes below it. It's possible, of course, that Pan is calling the
> sigmonster twice, as there are several blank lines between them. Is
> there any way to test?
Maybe you can have your sigmonster output the time as well, when it is
called?
On 05/20/2008 Duncan wrote:
Try fiddling with the permissions executable bit, and/or using
`cat /path/to/file/` for the command on a plain text file. Also,
make
sure the sig does /not/ have a sig delimiter line (properly dash dash
space, "-- " on it's own line, but pan should see "--" without
Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:11:09
-0700:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Bruce Bowler wrote:
>>
>>> Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing
>>> the message (and maybe hitt
Jim Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Bruce Bowler wrote:
Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing the
message (and maybe hitting send and the group doesn't exist in the
server for the selected profile).
Weird, I see it with some profiles on a con
On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Bruce Bowler wrote:
> Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing the
> message (and maybe hitting send and the group doesn't exist in the
> server for the selected profile).
Weird, I see it with some profiles on a consistent basis.
Jim
On 05/20/2008 Bruce Bowler wrote:
Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing
the
message (and maybe hitting send and the group doesn't exist in the
server for the selected profile).
I have one profile and the group has existed on the server for over a
decade. Not to
On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:44:20 + (UTC)
Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:00 -0700, Travis wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jim Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Sent: Tuesday,
> > May 20, 2008 11:39 AM
> > Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Dou
On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:00 -0700, Travis wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jim Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Sent: Tuesday,
> May 20, 2008 11:39 AM
> Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature
>
>
>> On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>>> I've just inst
Charles Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue,
20 May 2008 12:27:12 -0400:
> Has Charles abandoned further development of PAN?
No. However, he has a big tendency to work on it in fits and starts.
Before the rewrite appeared, it had been over a year (II
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:39 AM
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>> I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like
>> it, but
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like
> it, but there are a few, minor issues. The most obvious one has to do
> with the signature. If I tell it to use a text file, it sends the
> location of the file, not the
I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like
it, but there are a few, minor issues. The most obvious one has to do
with the signature. If I tell it to use a text file, it sends the
location of the file, not the contents. (Oddly enough, I see the
contents in the compo
On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:33:18 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon,
> 19 May 2008 15:03:32 -0400:
>
> > The latest PAN on my FC6 system is 2.3.1 [...]
>
> I haven't the foggiest where that version
Charles Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon,
19 May 2008 15:03:32 -0400:
> The latest PAN on my FC6 system is 2.3.1 [...]
I haven't the foggiest where that version number came from, but it's not
pan's. If it's correct, it's entirely Fedora's version n
17 matches
Mail list logo
