[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:15:55 -0800, Travis wrote:
>
>> pan-users-bounces+travis.shoreline=gmail.com-qX2TKyscuCcdnm
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:23 -0800, Travis wrote:
>>>
When I had Pan on XP Home it worked great. Since moving to a new
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 23 Feb 2007
19:21:19 -0500:
> In Pan 0.125, it seems when you highlight a collapsed thread in the
> header pane, it will auto-magically expand. Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Is this a bug or feature? I can'
Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat,
24 Feb 2007 01:24:25 +0100:
> I'm afraid your numbers are bit off - e.g. 2041 is "Mobile Network
> Tracing" etc. The MIME RFCs are 2045 ("Multipurpose Internet Mail
> Extensions (MIME) Part One") to 2049 ("Multipu
Jeff Berman wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if anybody could confirm something
for me.
With pan .125 or maybe .124, I'm seeing the return of
a previously-fixed bug. What happens is that if you
select a block of articles and then delete them, pan
sort of loses its place in the article list so that
yo
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:08:01 -0800, Jeff Berman wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering if anybody could confirm something for me.
>
> With pan .125 or maybe .124, I'm seeing the return of a previously-fixed
> bug. What happens is that if you select a block of articles and then
> delete them, pan sort of l
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Internet message headers as used in both mail and news were originally
>specified as 7-bit US-ASCII/ANSI, and for backward compatibility and
>interoperability, that remains the case at the "raw" level. The problem is
>that while the standards were later adapted
In Pan 0.125, it seems when you highlight a collapsed thread in the header
pane, it will auto-magically expand. Anyone else seeing this?
Is this a bug or feature? I can't say that I'm fond of it.
--
"You're not allowed to call them dinosaurs anymore." said Yo-less. "It's
speciesist. You have t
Hi, I was wondering if anybody could confirm something
for me.
With pan .125 or maybe .124, I'm seeing the return of
a previously-fixed bug. What happens is that if you
select a block of articles and then delete them, pan
sort of loses its place in the article list so that
you're positioned lower
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:15:55 -0800, Travis wrote:
> pan-users-bounces+travis.shoreline=gmail.com-qX2TKyscuCcdnm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:23 -0800, Travis wrote:
>>
>>> When I had Pan on XP Home it worked great. Since moving to a new
>>> computer with Vista Premium i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:23 -0800, Travis wrote:
>
>> When I had Pan on XP Home it worked great. Since moving to a new
>> computer with Vista Premium it doesn't save the groups to which I
am
>> subscribed. If I close Pan the next time I open it I have to
>> subscribe a
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:23 -0800, Travis wrote:
> When I had Pan on XP Home it worked great. Since moving to a new
> computer with Vista Premium it doesn't save the groups to which I am
> subscribed. If I close Pan the next time I open it I have to subscribe
> all over again
If you start pan
When I had Pan on XP Home it worked great. Since moving to a new
computer with Vista Premium it doesn't save the groups to which I am
subscribed. If I close Pan the next time I open it I have to
subscribe all over again
I installed the GTK thing and used the Pan build from here
http://davies147.
12 matches
Mail list logo
