Re: [Pan-users] Strange issue with missing headers when downloading new headers...and a request

Brian Costello wrote: Hello, I haven't looked into this issue as much as I'd like, but I was concerned that with 1.0 looming over the horizon, if I did all the necessary research to track down the problem definitively, I'd miss the chance to report a serious problem. Truthfully, I'm guessing

[Pan-users] Strange issue with missing headers when downloading new headers...and a request

Hello,I haven't looked into this issue as much as I'd like, but I was concerned that with 1.0 looming over the horizon, if I did all the necessary research to track down the problem definitively, I'd miss the chance to report a serious problem.  Truthfully, I'm guessing it's something with my news

Re: [Pan-users] Re: downloaded messages no longer marked, plus a request

Duncan wrote: > So, set that appropriately and the problem should disappear. I forget the > exact setting and don't have time to look it up ATM, but it's in the main > preferences.xml file (under ~/.pan2 as the default location), and a search > for "cache" should bring up the line fairly easily.

Re: [Pan-users] Re: ANNOUNCE: pan-attach and pan-attach-kd, version 0.0.2006.10.07.0

On Tuesday 10 October 2006 10:02, Duncan wrote: > The reason it isn't a choice for pan-attach(-kd) is due to the way the > standards are implemented.  It's a full framework, defining a specific > header (MIME-Version: 1.0) that must appear in any MIME compliant message, > with additional headers de

[Pan-users] Re: ANNOUNCE: pan-attach and pan-attach-kd, version 0.0.2006.10.07.0

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:37:53 +, Duncan wrote: > There remains the question of copyright and licensing, especially > relevant as the issues surrounding the GPLv3 update make news. For greatest > flexibility, I'd prefer you assign copyright to me (reserving use for > yourself of course). Basica

Re: [Pan-users] Re: ANNOUNCE: pan-attach and pan-attach-kd, version 0.0.2006.10.07.0

On Tuesday 10 October 2006 10:02, Duncan wrote: > AFAIK, neither Thunderbird nor KNode (nor OE for that matter) do yEnc. Sorry, I didn't make it clear I tried both yEnc and UUE with the same results. > yEnc (My Encoding, without the M and abbreviating encoding as enc, that's > the proper capitali

[Pan-users] Re: ANN Pan 0.116: "Blanton's"

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:55:18 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote: > October 10, 2006 - Pan 0.116: "Blanton's" > 360375 non-ascii subject is mangled Oh goody, the header problem I complained about in 356835 is gone. Thanks, guys! Windows build is up. Artur -- I'm afraid I just blue myself. Pan for Wind

[Pan-users] Re: gtkspell

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:53:48 +, Duncan wrote: > Thufir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on > Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:18:19 +0100: > >> I went over to , looks good :) >> >> Do you get corrections from Pan? I get errorz, but no co

Re: [Pan-users] ANN Pan 0.116: "Blanton's"

Charles Kerr wrote: October 10, 2006 - Pan 0.116: "Blanton's" This is "weekly" beta #27 of a full Pan redesign and rewrite in C++. The brisk release schedule is to encourage feedback and a short turnaround time on bug fixes. These betas will culminate very soon with Pan 1.0, so feedback is stro

[Pan-users] ANN Pan 0.116: "Blanton's"

October 10, 2006 - Pan 0.116: "Blanton's" This is "weekly" beta #27 of a full Pan redesign and rewrite in C++. The brisk release schedule is to encourage feedback and a short turnaround time on bug fixes. These betas will culminate very soon with Pan 1.0, so feedback is strongly encouraged. Thi

[Pan-users] Re: gtkspell

Thufir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:18:19 +0100: > I went over to , looks good :) > > Do you get corrections from Pan? I get errorz, but no correctionz, that > is, how too korrect my speleng (or, even, gr

[Pan-users] Re: clearing the cache

"Travis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:16:49 -0700: > No worries about what is on my computer. > ;-) > > Is a larger cache advantageous? It depends on how you use pan. The way I use it for binary groups, definitely, altho I'm fine with

[Pan-users] Re: ANNOUNCE: pan-attach and pan-attach-kd, version 0.0.2006.10.07.0

Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:02:38 +0100: > On Saturday 07 October 2006 11:45, Duncan wrote: >> pan-attach and pan-attach-kd are scripts designed to allow posting >> attachments with pan.  URL below. > > Duncan, I had some comments fr

[Pan-users] Re: gtkspell

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:02:38 -0500, fred wrote: > Hey Guys > > I just noticed when I went to configure 0.115 that it shows gtkspell no > ( I never noticed it before). I checked and I have gtkspell 2.0.11 > installed (listed as current version). Running FC5. Anybody else notice > this? Not a bi