I was having a heck of a time building with gcc 3.4.6 in 512MB; it kept
hanging on scorefile-test until I looked through the archives and found
a suggestion to remove -O2 from my CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, and that was the
trick. Y'all might want to put that in the FAQ or INSTALL or something.
Anyhow, as o
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:27:24 -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
>
>>> If some of the files are incomplete, it would display
>>>
>>> +foobar.rar (89/93)
>>>
>>> Expanding the "thread" would show the individual files.
>>
>> Hmmm, that's rather cool! A
On Oct 1, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
If some of the files are incomplete, it would display
+foobar.rar (89/93)
Expanding the "thread" would show the individual files.
Hmmm, that's rather cool! As you have described it, threaded
binary sets
would intergrate very well into
Travis wrote:
Original Message
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
u.org] On Behalf Of fred
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 13:13
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Multipart posts?
Duncan wrote:
fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Original Message
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
u.org] On Behalf Of Graham
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 16:01
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Pan-users] Binary Postings Through Newspost
> I know this issue has come up before, but as we're getting
> towards the final
Original Message
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
u.org] On Behalf Of fred
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 13:13
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Multipart posts?
> Duncan wrote:
>> fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Oct 2006
17:32:36 -0400:
>> BRN2 does something similar. It "threads" binary sets with similar names.
>> For example, while pan would display:
>>
>> foobar.rar.001
>> foobar.rar.002
>> foobar.rar.003
"Jack Cuyler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:43:16
+:
> I did some fiddling with the source code and came up something, I think.
> I changed one line in article.h and everything went smoothly from there.
> The patch is in bug 358654.
R
"Timothy J. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun,
01 Oct 2006 18:05:03 -0500:
> Long time user, first time posting...
>
> I'm using 0.115 on Kubuntu.
>
> Is it possible to select more than one newsgroup? It seems kind of silly that
> there would be an
Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon,
02 Oct 2006 00:00:57 +0100:
> I know this issue has come up before, but as we're getting towards the
> final version of Pan, can some consideration be given to those who wish
> to post to binary newsgroups?
>
> Current
I mostly use Pan for downloading binaries and multipart binaries. It would be
really, really nice if the task manager would queue the headers for
downloading in the same order that they appear in the header window.
What if I queue for downloading several different files posted as separate
mult
I know this issue has come up before, but as we're getting towards the
final version of Pan, can some consideration be given to those who wish
to post to binary newsgroups?
Currently, I have to do this independently of Pan, as Pan contains no
facilities to encode the binary postings.
It has been
Long time user, first time posting...
I'm using 0.115 on Kubuntu.
Is it possible to select more than one newsgroup? It seems kind of silly that
there would be an icon for "Get new headers for selected groups" when it is
not possible to select more than one group.
Am I missing something?
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:33:57 + (UTC)
"Jack Cuyler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BRN2 does something similar. It "threads" binary sets with similar names.
> For example, while pan would display:
>
> foobar.rar.001
> foobar.rar.002
> foobar.rar.003
>
> foobar.rar.092
> foobar.rar.093
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:36:34 -0500, fred wrote:
> Hey Guys
>
> With all the memory improvements lately (thanks Charles really helped me
> a lot) I was wondering if pan could carry it to the screen. When you
> have multipart post like partX.rar could pan stack them so all one
> would see is on
Duncan wrote:
fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006
11:36:34 -0500:
With all the memory improvements lately (thanks Charles really helped me a
lot) I was wondering if pan could carry it to the screen. When you have
multipart post like partX.
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Darren wrote:
>
> Charles Kerr wrote:
>> September 30, 2006 - Pan 0.115: "Mrs. Kerr Says Remember the Tip
>> Jar"
>
> Well you've now covered all of the items I think anyone could
> reasonably want with the 1.0 release! If there are no major bug
> reports is the next releas
Yeah, saw that too. Wonderfull improvement!
Great job Charles, thanks!!
C
On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:57, jef_e wrote:
> Charles Kerr wrote:
> > I'm running out of tricks, though. :)
>
> Just wanted to toss in my last minute 2 cents on 0.114 and the patch
> before I move on to 0.115. I use Gigan
Charles Kerr wrote:
> I'm running out of tricks, though. :)
Just wanted to toss in my last minute 2 cents on 0.114 and the patch
before I move on to 0.115. I use Giganews and decided to let 0.114 pull
in all 90 days worth of headers for alt.binaries.dvd just to see what
happened. I hadn't loaded
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006
11:20:28 -0500:
> I played with klibido a little bit this week. I like it and found much
> worth stealing. =) I particularly liked the 'parts' column in the header
> window, that the task window show
fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006
11:36:34 -0500:
> With all the memory improvements lately (thanks Charles really helped me a
> lot) I was wondering if pan could carry it to the screen. When you have
> multipart post like partX.rar could pan
"walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:10:50
+:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:22:21 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:35:54 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
>>
>>> September 30, 2006 - Pan 0.115: "Mrs. Kerr Says Remember the Tip
On Saturday 30 Sep 2006 23:20, Les Newell wrote:
> If I remember correctly the old Pan used to do
> this well.
It certainly does.
--
Mike
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
Mike wrote:
On Saturday 30 Sep 2006 17:36, fred wrote:
When you
have multipart post like partX.rar could pan stack them so all one
would see is one entry. This is assuming that they are already being
stored as something like varible+varitation.rar. You could view what
part is missing essenti
On Saturday 30 Sep 2006 17:36, fred wrote:
> When you
> have multipart post like partX.rar could pan stack them so all one
> would see is one entry. This is assuming that they are already being
> stored as something like varible+varitation.rar. You could view what
> part is missing essentially by
25 matches
Mail list logo
