Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-28 Thread Robert Marshall
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Charles Kerr wrote: > That would be great too, but I'm looking at LXF81 and it > says: "We reviewed 0.14.0 in LXF42". Maybe it's a misprint, > or maybe Pan's in both issues. > I should have LXF42 but it isn't where it should be in the old issues pile...I'll have a dig aroun

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-28 Thread Charles Kerr
>>> Hmm... here, it's coming and going. Right now, it's gone. >>... And now it's back, again, after switching a few more groups. >> /I/ don't know! > FYI, the same thing happens on windows so it's either pan or gtk. I > haven't been anoyed enough yet to try and figure it out though. It's a Pa

[Pan-users] Re: Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-28 Thread Jim Henderson
The issue in question is July 2003; I don't go back that far myself, but that might help someone who subscribed at that time identify that they do have the issue. Jim ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/list

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-28 Thread K. Haley
Duncan wrote: > "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:49:28 > +: > > >> Hmm... here, it's coming and going. Right now, it's gone. >> > > ... And now it's back, again, after switching a few more groups. > /I/ don't know! > >

[Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-28 Thread walt
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:28:31 +, Duncan wrote: > "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:49:28 > +: > >> Hmm... here, it's coming and going. Right now, it's gone. > > ... And now it's back, again, after switching a few more groups

Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-28 Thread Charles Kerr
That would be great too, but I'm looking at LXF81 and it says: "We reviewed 0.14.0 in LXF42". Maybe it's a misprint, or maybe Pan's in both issues. > According to [url] it was reviewd in issue 47, is that > what you are looking for? > Charles Kerr wrote: >> In the latest issue of Linux Format, t

Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-28 Thread Darren
According to http://www.linuxformat.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=5#47 It was reviewed in issue 47, is that what you are looking for? Charles Kerr wrote: > In the latest issue of Linux Format, they say that they reviewed 0.14.0 > back in issue #42, wh

[Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-28 Thread Charles Kerr
In the latest issue of Linux Format, they say that they reviewed 0.14.0 back in issue #42, which would've been sometime in 2003-04, I think. I'm kind of curious what they said -- does anyone have a copy of this issue that they could scan and mail me the Pan page(s)? If anyone has this I'd be very

Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Round One of Closing Old, Unseconded Feature Requests

2006-07-28 Thread Darren
Charles Kerr wrote: > (4) http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133085 > I would like to be able to pipe the decoded file to > an external program like eeyes or jiv to view bmp / jpg2000 files > (7) http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100975 > Let Pan prompt the user for a p

[Pan-users] Re: ANN: Round One of Closing Old, Unseconded Feature Requests

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:44:52 -0500: > Here's a last chance to vote for these bugs before they're closed > forever. :) > (4) http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133085 > I would like to be able to pipe the dec

[Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:49:28 +: > Hmm... here, it's coming and going. Right now, it's gone. ... And now it's back, again, after switching a few more groups. /I/ don't know! -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No H

[Pan-users] Re: feature request: show arbitrary headers

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
John Steele Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:09:14 +0900: > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:59:23 +, Duncan wrote: >> (Do a search for a similar open request first tho, in case someone's >> already requested it, thus avoiding a duplicate. Sti

[Pan-users] Re: Re: ANN: Pan 0.105 "When Churchill opened the door, it was a new car, a Chevrolet Nova."

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
Brad Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:11:13 -0500: > On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:38 pm, Duncan wrote: >> I can confirm editing accels.txt works!  =8^)  Just the old GUI method >> of setting them doesn't, but perhaps that's by design, as wi

[Pan-users] Re: Re: ANN: Pan 0.105 "When Churchill opened the door, it was a new car, a Chevrolet Nova."

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:42:55 -0400: > I've found myself using USENET more just to use Pan more. :) That would hardly be possible here, given I already spend hours a day in the groups (including the lists such as thi

[Pan-users] Re: downloads stalling out

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
Jeff Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:58:10 -0700: > I think what is happening is that pan is grabbing articles so rapidly that > it's causing my old Linksys router to freak out. Some time ago Cox > Communications apparently updated the

[Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-28 Thread Duncan
Ken Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:25:27 -0700: >> If not, I'll have to trace down the issue, but I thought I'd mention I'm >> missing the icons now too, so it's quite possible he meant exactly what >> he said -- nothing showing up in th

[Pan-users] ANN: Round One of Closing Old, Unseconded Feature Requests

2006-07-28 Thread Charles Kerr
These enhancement requests have gathered dust in bugzilla for over a year without being seconded or thirded. Here's a last chance to vote for these bugs before they're closed forever. :) To vote for a feature, add a comment on its bugzilla page to say that you'd use this feature. Only do this if