Charles Kerr wrote:
[...]
>
> I have to admit this thread baffles me. For the most part,
> aggregated servers will "just work"...
This first came to my attention when one of my premium servers
was having timeout problems (reason still unknown to me). But
pan would grind to an absolute standstil
> I'm sorry to say I found it so contrary to the way I work, that I gave up
> entirely, until the new version reaches 1.0 -- which, I hope, I hope
> (pretty please with sugar on it?) may make it an option whether to
> aggregate them. Is there hope?
>
> Both just feel so wrong, somehow, that they ke
Right now the header pane's date column shows that row's article's date.
This is straightforward, but when sorting you get the date of the first
post in a thread. But what if you're looking for active threads?
In that case, you really want to sort by the newest followup's date.
I'm leaning toward
On Jul 4, 2006, at 4:18 PM, walt wrote:
I'm sorry to say I found it so contrary to the way I work, that I
gave up
entirely, until the new version reaches 1.0 -- which, I hope, I hope
(pretty please with sugar on it?) may make it an option whether to
aggregate them. Is there hope?
No idea.
Duncan wrote:
If it crashes, you know it's the newsgroup list so you can simply attach
that to your bug report. Charles should be able to reproduce it from the
same list and trace it from there.
Ok, I've submitted bug 346588 based on your suggestion. The newsgroup
list was default_unsub.dat
Beartooth wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:33:27 -0700, walt wrote:
> [...]
>> I agree that there are both pluses and minuses to aggregating
>> servers. I'm not at all sure yet that I like it, but I'm trying
>> to keep an open mind.
> [...]
>> Patience will be required ;o)
>
> I tried it when Char
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:33:27 -0700, walt wrote:
[...]
> I agree that there are both pluses and minuses to aggregating
> servers. I'm not at all sure yet that I like it, but I'm trying
> to keep an open mind.
[...]
> Patience will be required ;o)
I tried it when Charles (blessed be his name, now a
Duncan wrote:
David Shochat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 04 Jul 2006
07:30:00 -0400:
I do NOT get the crash when I use a different news server. So it is
something in the newsgroup list of this particular server
(newsgroups.comcast.net, actually gig
David Kelly wrote:
> ...I don't always have access to all
> servers all the time. As a result pan spends a lot of time trying to
> connect to a server which is not available.
I agree that there are both pluses and minuses to aggregating
servers. I'm not at all sure yet that I like it, but I'm try
David Shochat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 04 Jul 2006
07:30:00 -0400:
> I do NOT get the crash when I use a different news server. So it is
> something in the newsgroup list of this particular server
> (newsgroups.comcast.net, actually giganews) which
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:29 PM, walt wrote:
Thanks. I tried looking for the groups from the other server
Hm. I don't know what you mean by 'other server'. If you told pan
about two different servers then pan will use both of them without
any further instructions from you.
In a way that is nic
Duncan wrote:
David Shochat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 03 Jul 2006
19:24:23 -0400:
Since I need to report a crash, I need to get a gdb stack trace. That
means I need to compile with debug (with symbols). How do I do that?
>From the gcc manp
12 matches
Mail list logo