Re: [Pan-users] Version 0.91 impressions

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Marshall
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Robert Marshall wrote: > > This wasn't my experience - I had a download hang [1] last night (after > an hour :-() so having read this message thought I'd have to restart but > this morning on restarting pan it is going from where it was. > > > Robert > [1] I got a message ab

Re: [Pan-users] Version 0.91 impressions

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Marshall
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jim Reiss wrote: > > It appears that all tasks disappear if you exit the program. I don't > know if that's the case with a crash, but either way I think there > should at least be an option to resume tasks from a previous session. I > have sometimes exited the CVS version be

Re: [Pan-users] 0.90 - memory/swap issues back

2006-04-04 Thread jef_e
Charles Kerr wrote: > Try loading _that_ in Pan 0.14! >:) Good point ;-) As I reflected upon this at work today, I somewhere forgot that when I last loaded this full group, I did it incrementally. On another point, will we see the "offline/online" switch come back? Thanks! jef

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.90 "Sero Sed Serio" x86_64 build error

2006-04-04 Thread Jeff Vian
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:31 -0400, Byron Sonne wrote: > Greetings, > > Awesome news that the beta's out! Just grabbed it and started to build, > hoping to put together some amd64 RPMs (another thing I don't know how > to do yet). > > OS is suse 10, the ./configure went ok, no issues it appears,

[Pan-users] Pan 0.91, fixed suse 10 amd64 build

2006-04-04 Thread Byron Sonne
Greetings, Well, whatever you did worked. Pan 0.91 up and running. Thank you very much for your time and attention to detail! Now to start building some RPMs... Cheers, Byron Sonne ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongn

[Pan-users] 0.90/0.91 no post icons/menu

2006-04-04 Thread henri naccache
not sure why i don't have any post icons or menu options. seems to work if i hit "p" or "f" though henri ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

[Pan-users] Version 0.91 impressions

2006-04-04 Thread Jim Reiss
I see on the developer list that the current beta's limited options are meant to be complained about, to get a sense of what was used and what wasn't...at least as far as preferences go. I've just built the 0.91 version and started trying it out, and some initial impressions: It appears that all

[Pan-users] Pan 0.9x - saving UI settings etc

2006-04-04 Thread Brian Morrison
I'm finding that Pan 0.90 and 0.91 do not save any settings for me, each time I open the program I have to reset everything to how I like it. Is this due to the early code version at present, or something else? I've built Pan quite happily from source, and it doesn't throw up any errors or warning

[Pan-users] Re: Windows build of 0.91 is up.

2006-04-04 Thread Kevin Gottsman
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:58:06 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote: > The windows version is up on the website now. I don't have a 'clean' > Windows box to download it to, so I'd appreciate a ping back on whether it > works or not. > > It uses the gimp-win gtk+ 2.8 runtime (also mirrored on rebelbase) rathe

Re: [Pan-users] Windows build of 0.91 is up.

2006-04-04 Thread Artur Jachacy
Charles Kerr wrote: The windows version is up on the website now. Thanks! I don't have a 'clean' Windows box to download it to, so I'd appreciate a ping back on whether it works or not. What do you exactly mean by 'works'? Main problems for now (don't know if they're Windows specific or no

[Pan-users] Windows build of 0.91 is up.

2006-04-04 Thread Charles Kerr
The windows version is up on the website now. I don't have a 'clean' Windows box to download it to, so I'd appreciate a ping back on whether it works or not. It uses the gimp-win gtk+ 2.8 runtime (also mirrored on rebelbase) rather than the old dropline gtk+ 2.2 runtime. No installer yet, so aft

[Pan-users] Re: Authentication and upgrade paths (was: ANN: Pan 0.90 "Sero Sed Serio")

2006-04-04 Thread Jim Henderson
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:55:17 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Scores... are fairly standardized. The scoring code, like the newsrc > code, was designed to make use of a common format. Cool, thanks for that info. Jim ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@non

Re: [Pan-users] Building 0.90 on Ubuntu Breezy?

2006-04-04 Thread Charles Kerr
>>> Any one had any luck. Got an issue as libpcre3-dev doesn't have a >>> libpcre.pc file so configure breaks. >> >> Easy solve: put a source link in your sources file, then apt-get source >> libpcre3-dev, and do a debuild in that directory. That should get you a >> .pc file, which you can copy in

[Pan-users] Re: ANN: Pan 0.91 "I'm lost. I'm drunk. I'm impure. What a life!"

2006-04-04 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:54:02 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote: > [Release announcement] I hope that you'll commit the code to GNOME CVS asap. Oddly, the 0.9x tarballs do not contain the Bulgarian translation (although after running intltool-update only 84 strings are translated, so not a big problem, ac

[Pan-users] slightly annoying "bug"

2006-04-04 Thread Bruce Bowler
I'm still on 0.14.2.91. Haven't made the jump to the new version yet... My preferences are set to not expand threads by default and I work in the 3 pane layout with the group along the left side, header top right and body bottom right. I don't know if any of that matters. Occasionally (I haven'

Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan 0.91 "I'm lost. I'm drunk. I'm impure. What a life!"

2006-04-04 Thread Charles Kerr
> uint not defined: article.cc, actions.cc, gui.h, task-xover.cc Fixed. > in url.cc the glib.h include needs to be moved above the #ifdef, > otherwise G_OS_WIN32 is not defined. d'oh! Fixed. Thanks! ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org

Re: [Pan-users] Building 0.90 on Ubuntu Breezy?

2006-04-04 Thread Steven Adeff
On 4/4/06, Steven Adeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/4/06, Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 06:35, Steven Ellis wrote: > > > Any one had any luck. Got an issue as libpcre3-dev doesn't have a > > > libpcre.pc file so configure breaks. > > > > Easy solve: put

Re: [Pan-users] Building 0.90 on Ubuntu Breezy?

2006-04-04 Thread Steven Adeff
On 4/4/06, Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 04 April 2006 06:35, Steven Ellis wrote: > > Any one had any luck. Got an issue as libpcre3-dev doesn't have a > > libpcre.pc file so configure breaks. > > Easy solve: put a source link in your sources file, then apt-get source > libpc

Re: [Pan-users] Building 0.90 on Ubuntu Breezy?

2006-04-04 Thread Jan De Luyck
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 06:35, Steven Ellis wrote: > Any one had any luck. Got an issue as libpcre3-dev doesn't have a > libpcre.pc file so configure breaks. Easy solve: put a source link in your sources file, then apt-get source libpcre3-dev, and do a debuild in that directory. That should get

Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan 0.91 "I'm lost. I'm drunk. I'm impure. What a life!"

2006-04-04 Thread K. Haley
Charles Kerr wrote: Pan 0.91 is a quick bugfix release to address some of the build errors and other problems found in 0.90. A few remaining compile bugs: uint not defined: article.cc, actions.cc, gui.h, task-xover.cc in url.cc the glib.h include needs to be moved above the #if