[Pan-users] Re: More info on the impending version of Pan

2006-03-28 Thread Duncan
Charles Kerr posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:43:49 -0600: > * Many preferences settings have gone away. > (i.e., use Gnome or Windows registry to know what web browser to use) What about those that don't have Gnome installed, only KDE? What file do we ed

Re: [Pan-users] More info on the impending version of Pan

2006-03-28 Thread DPA
Charles Kerr wrote: I'm glad there are people interested in new versions of Pan! I should have the code ready for cvs in a couple of days. I think there are a lot of PAN users, probably more than anybody realizes so you may have made a lot of people happy! ;) The new version works on gtk 2

RE: [Pan-users] More info on the impending version of Pan

2006-03-28 Thread Travis
Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Charles Kerr Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 09:44 To: pan-users@nongnu.org Subject: [Pan-users] More info on the impending version of Pan > I'm glad there are people interested in new versions of Pan! > I

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Coming April 1: Pan 0.90

2006-03-28 Thread David Kelly
On Mar 28, 2006, at 6:06 AM, Duncan wrote: How about pan++ or panxx? How about lid, pot or kettle? :-) I'd say pot, save for the potential bad jokes.* kettle if not. [...] * If it's called pot, then we all become pot users!Further, the MSWormOS port, if continued, could be called

[Pan-users] Re: Coming April 1: Pan 0.90

2006-03-28 Thread Duncan
David Kelly posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:47:36 -0600: > > On Mar 21, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Jim Reiss wrote: > >>> No, not yet. I'll send mail to pan-users and pan-devel when I >>> land it >>> in CVS... I'm not sure that it wouldn't make more sense to have

[Pan-users] Re: Re: New Groups - does it work?

2006-03-28 Thread Duncan
jef_e posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:17:20 -0500: > Kevin Brammer wrote: > >> The CVS version I'm using doesn't have a "get new groups" option. It >> has a "get list of groups", that's it. Once that completes, I select >> "New Groups" from the pull-down tha