David Kelly posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:47:36 -0600:
> > On Mar 21, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Jim Reiss wrote: > >>> No, not yet. I'll send mail to pan-users and pan-devel when I >>> land it >>> in CVS... I'm not sure that it wouldn't make more sense to have a new >>> package name, at least in CVS, since the entire codebase is >>> different. >> >> How about pan++ or panxx? > > How about lid, pot or kettle? :-) I'd say pot, save for the potential bad jokes.* kettle if not. panxx sounds too much like a porn group targeted app. While I'm sure many users use it for that, if pimp-ass-newsreader (aka PAN) was too offensive, panxx would certainly be so as well, to the same class of folks. (Of course, my binary downloader at present is klibido...) ... * If it's called pot, then we all become pot users! <g> Further, the MSWormOS port, if continued, could be called porti-potti, given the undisguised opinion of the OS by folks such as myself. =8^P -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
