[opensource-dev] For the benefit of TPV developers.

Multiple attachment and inventory items links backport for viewer v1.23.5 and Snowglobe v1.5 is available now as a standalone patch (in fact two, one for each viewer branch) from my website. See the announces for details: http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=321&p=1319#p1319 (multiple at

Re: [opensource-dev] Question about LOD debug setting

On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:37:49 -0400, Ponzu wrote: > I picked up a notecard that says to increase RenderVolumeLODFactor to 4. Is > this reasonable, do you think? And if so, why not increase the default a > bit (currently seems to be 1.125 4 is OK for viewer v1.23.5. For Snowglobe (v1 and v2) and v

Re: [opensource-dev] Question about LOD debug setting

On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:01:00 -0700 (PDT), Ann Otoole wrote: > Whats the jira for this defect you say exists that I have never once observed > despite always using a setting of 4? I don't contribute to the JIRA any more: what's the point when LL marks the issues as "will not finish" or just plain

Re: [opensource-dev] simconsole is available for experimentation

I was curious about this new feature, but since I'm not using viewer 2 I just bacported it... You'll find attached to this message a patch which is a backport of the sim console to v1.23.5 (will also work with Snowglobe v1: there's one reject in CMakeList.txt but you can ignore it safely since it

[opensource-dev] Missing capabilities.

Hello, There are, in my opinion, missing capabilities for the new viewer 2 features, namely the capabilities dealing with inventory item links support, multiple attachments per point support, and multiple clothing layers support. Without the correpsonding capabilities, it is impossible for the vi

Re: [opensource-dev] Missing capabilities.

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:37:42 -0700, Kelly Linden wrote: > I'm confused on this. While the term 'capability' is a bit vague, in SL > development / programming it is very specific. It is not a flag that > indicates the availability of a feature - it is an access point to access > features. It has th

[opensource-dev] What is the license status of UI sounds ?

Greetings, As many of you probably know or noticed, the viewer UI sounds are currently sound assets that the viewer must retrieve from the asset server and then decode into a temporary *.dsf file before being able to use them. This poses a number of issues: - There is a significant delay between

Re: [opensource-dev] What is the license status of UI sounds ?

On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 22:07:28 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > On 2010-11-05 16:50, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > > These issues could easily be solved (I got a patch ready), provided the UI > > sounds could be distributed as part of the default skin (for example in > >

[opensource-dev] Display names support.

I got it implemented for the Snowglobe v1.5 code base... See the details in these messages: http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=265&p=1541#p1541 http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=399 The patch itself is available here: http://sldev.free.fr/patches/12500/slviewer-0-v12500-D

Re: [opensource-dev] map

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:41:10 -0800, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Boroondas Gupte > wrote: > > > Shouldn't that be fixed since > > SNOW-77? > > Of course, you'd need a recent enough OpenSim version so that

<    1   2   3   4