Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-26 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On 26 Nov 2014 13:59, "Julian Taylor" wrote: > > concerning actually fixing it I guess we have 3 options: > > 1. reduce maximum copy alignment from currently 16 to 8 on platforms > that need it. > That will automatically reduce the needed alignment of complex on win32 > to 8 bytes. Do other compil

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 11/26/2014 02:19 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Julian Taylor > > mailto:jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com>> > > wrote: > > > > On 11/26/2014 12:50 AM, Andrea Gavan

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-26 Thread Julian Taylor
On 11/26/2014 02:19 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Julian Taylor > mailto:jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com>> > wrote: > > On 11/26/2014 12:50 AM, Andrea Gavana wrote: > > > > On 25 November 2014 at 19:33, David Cournapeau

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 11/26/2014 12:50 AM, Andrea Gavana wrote: > > > > On 25 November 2014 at 19:33, David Cournapeau > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Sturla Molden > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Julian Taylor googlemail.com> writes: [clip] > There haven't been any real complaints from applications yet, only > testsuite failure of scipy. > Either the one thing that is broken in scipy isn't much used or windows > 32 users aren't using 1.9 yet. What is broken is calculating eigenvalues of c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-26 Thread Julian Taylor
On 11/26/2014 12:50 AM, Andrea Gavana wrote: > > On 25 November 2014 at 19:33, David Cournapeau > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Sturla Molden > mailto:sturla.mol...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > David Cournapeau

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-25 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Andrea Gavana wrote: > > On 25 November 2014 at 19:33, David Cournapeau wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Sturla Molden >> wrote: >>> >>> David Cournapeau wrote: >>> > Shall we consider >> > >>> > href="https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/41

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-25 Thread Andrea Gavana
On 25 November 2014 at 19:33, David Cournapeau wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Sturla Molden > wrote: > >> David Cournapeau wrote: >> > Shall we consider > > href="https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168";> >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168 >> > to be a >> > blocker

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-25 Thread David Cournapeau
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Sturla Molden wrote: > David Cournapeau wrote: > > Shall we consider > href="https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168";> > https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168 > > to be a > > blocker (the issue arises on scipy master as well as 0.14.1) ? > > > > It is r

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.15.0 beta 1 release

2014-11-25 Thread Sturla Molden
David Cournapeau wrote: > Shall we consider href="https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168";>https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168 > to be a > blocker (the issue arises on scipy master as well as 0.14.1) ? > It is really bad, but does anyone know what is really going on? Which changes t