On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Andrea Gavana <andrea.gav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 25 November 2014 at 19:33, David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Sturla Molden <sturla.mol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Shall we consider <a >>> > >>> > href="https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168";>https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/4168</a> >>> > to be a >>> > blocker (the issue arises on scipy master as well as 0.14.1) ? >>> > >>> >>> It is really bad, but does anyone know what is really going on? >> >> >> Yes, it is in the bug report. > > > > Nice move. > > I've now recommended to hold back any upgrade/update/pip-crap/enpkg-fun > thing on NumPy/SciPy across the whole user base of Python in the company. We > will probably move to 64bit-in-any-sense soon enough, I guess before this > issue is solved. Tell me, NumPy, was the array aligned enough in 1.8? Is > NumPy stricter in its checking because of SPARC? SPARC?!?
It's a regression in 1.9, yes; 1.8 is fine. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
