23.02.2013 20:31, Sergio Callegari kirjoitti:
> Partially fixed.
>
> I was messing the row, column order. For some reason this was working in some
> case. Now I've fixed it and it *always* works.
>
> However, it is still slower than the cblas
>
> cblas -> 0.69 sec
> scipy blas -> 0.74 sec
The
Partially fixed.
I was messing the row, column order. For some reason this was working in some
case. Now I've fixed it and it *always* works.
However, it is still slower than the cblas
cblas -> 0.69 sec
scipy blas -> 0.74 sec
Any clue why?
___
Num
... and it is not deterministic too...
About 1 time over 6 the code calling the scipy blas gives a completely wrong
result. How can this be?
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discus
Hi,
following the excellent advice of V. Armando Sole, I have finally succeeded in
calling the blas routines shipped with scipy from cython.
I am doing this to avoid shipping an extra blas library for some project of
mine that uses scipy but has some things coded in cython for extra speed.
So fa
