23.02.2013 20:31, Sergio Callegari kirjoitti: > Partially fixed. > > I was messing the row, column order. For some reason this was working in some > case. Now I've fixed it and it *always* works. > > However, it is still slower than the cblas > > cblas -> 0.69 sec > scipy blas -> 0.74 sec
The possible explanations are that either the routine called is different in the two cases, or, the benchmark if somehow faulty. -- Pauli Virtanen _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
