Re: ratelimit atmsvc failure messages

2006-02-13 Thread David S. Miller
From: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:57:56 -0500 > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:35:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > From: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:24:23 -0500 > > > > > This seems to be trivial to trigger. > > > > > > Signed

Re: ratelimit atmsvc failure messages

2006-02-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:35:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:24:23 -0500 > > > This seems to be trivial to trigger. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Applied, thanks. I did some more testing with

Re: ratelimit atmsvc failure messages

2006-02-13 Thread David S. Miller
From: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:24:23 -0500 > This seems to be trivial to trigger. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] M

ratelimit atmsvc failure messages

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Jones
This seems to be trivial to trigger. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/atm/signaling.c~2006-02-11 19:20:09.0 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/atm/signaling.c 2006-02-11 19:21:30.0 -0500 @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static void sigd_put_skb(s