Andy Furniss wrote:
Hmm - I did some testing on old kernels, though I know I sorted it to
2ms I haven't got that kernel anymore and setting a vanilla 2.4.26 to hz
500 made the forwarded traffic cycle with 5ms not 2ms, local doesn't
cycle but isn't constant and gives 5ms varience.
Running the
Andy Furniss wrote:
You are comparing two completely different ->systems<-. Please stop being
focused on HZ, ok ? HZ does not rule the priority of the in-kernel tasks.
OK - It was just that changing HZ sorted it on 2.4.
Hmm - I did some testing on old kernels, though I know I sorted it to
2
Francois Romieu wrote:
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
They will be the same as connexent haven't touched the drivers for
years, Patrick ported them to 2.6 and a diff doesn't show any difference
involving HZ that I can see.
You are comparing two completely different ->systems<-. Pl
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> They will be the same as connexent haven't touched the drivers for
> years, Patrick ported them to 2.6 and a diff doesn't show any difference
> involving HZ that I can see.
You are comparing two completely different ->systems<-. Please stop being
focuse
Francois Romieu wrote:
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[ping latencies fluctuates with conexant adsl driver]
Does anyone know what could be causing this.
You will have a hard time figuring it and many people (me included)
will keep a good distance with an issue which includes > 400 ko of
Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[ping latencies fluctuates with conexant adsl driver]
> Does anyone know what could be causing this.
You will have a hard time figuring it and many people (me included)
will keep a good distance with an issue which includes > 400 ko of
unknown gcc 3 compiled bina
I long ago noticed that if I ping somewhere on the internet for any
length of time I see a pattern - the ping times will slowly rise then
fall by 10ms and repeat the process.
I never asked before because my dsl modem taints the kernel - but I
think testing I did on 2.4s could mean that it's no
