On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:33:06AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 3/11/21 4:04 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > I have a question about PHY framework, please point me if something I
> > misunderstanding.
> > There are many scenarios from PHY framework would trigger auto-nego, such
> > as switch f
On 3/11/21 4:04 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Florian Fainelli
>> Sent: 2021年3月9日 1:57
>> To: Joakim Zhang ; Jakub Kicinski
>> ; Andrew Lunn
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: stmmac driver timeout issu
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Sent: 2021年3月9日 1:57
> To: Joakim Zhang ; Jakub Kicinski
> ; Andrew Lunn
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: stmmac driver timeout issue
>
> On 3/8/21 4:45 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >
> >
On 3/8/21 4:45 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi Florian, Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your help, after debug, It seems related to PHY(RTL8211FDI). It
> stop output RXC clock for dozens to hundreds milliseconds during
> auto-negotiation, and there is no such issue with AR8031.
> When do ifup/ifdown test
n
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: stmmac driver timeout issue
>
> On 3/4/21 5:14 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Hello Andrew, Hello Jakub,
> >
> > You may can give some suggestions based on your great networking
> knowledge, thanks
On 3/4/21 5:14 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew, Hello Jakub,
>
> You may can give some suggestions based on your great networking knowledge,
> thanks in advance!
>
> I found that add vlan id hw filter (stmmac_vlan_rx_add_vid) have possibility
> timeout when accessing VLAN Filter regis
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 01:14:31PM +, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew, Hello Jakub,
>
> You may can give some suggestions based on your great networking knowledge,
> thanks in advance!
>
> I found that add vlan id hw filter (stmmac_vlan_rx_add_vid) have possibility
> timeout when acce
Hi Jose,
On 5/28/2018 4:26 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 28-05-2018 10:15, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/25/2018 8:02 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
On 25-05-2018 15:25, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/25/2018 7:35 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 25-05-2018 05:41, Bhadram Vark
Hi Bhadram,
On 28-05-2018 10:15, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On 5/25/2018 8:02 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> On 25-05-2018 15:25, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>>> Hi Jose,
>>>
>>> On 5/25/2018 7:35 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 25-05-2018 05:41, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Jose,
Hi Jose,
On 5/25/2018 8:02 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
On 25-05-2018 15:25, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/25/2018 7:35 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 25-05-2018 05:41, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/24/2018 3:01 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 24-05-2018 06:58, Bhadram Vark
On 25-05-2018 15:25, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On 5/25/2018 7:35 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Bhadram,
>>
>> On 25-05-2018 05:41, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>>> Hi Jose,
>>>
>>> On 5/24/2018 3:01 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 24-05-2018 06:58, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>
>>>
Hi Jose,
On 5/25/2018 7:35 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 25-05-2018 05:41, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/24/2018 3:01 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 24-05-2018 06:58, Bhadram Varka wrote:
After some time if check Tx descriptor status - then I see only
below
[..]
[85788.
Hi Bhadram,
On 25-05-2018 05:41, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On 5/24/2018 3:01 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Bhadram,
>>
>> On 24-05-2018 06:58, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>>>
>>> After some time if check Tx descriptor status - then I see only
>>> below
>>>
>>> [..]
>>> [85788.286730] 027 [0x82795
Hi Jose,
On 5/24/2018 3:01 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 24-05-2018 06:58, Bhadram Varka wrote:
After some time if check Tx descriptor status - then I see only
below
[..]
[85788.286730] 027 [0x827951b0]: 0xf854f000 0x0 0x16d8 0x9000
index 025 and 026 descriptors processed but not
Hi Bhadram,
On 24-05-2018 06:58, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>
> After some time if check Tx descriptor status - then I see only
> below
>
> [..]
> [85788.286730] 027 [0x827951b0]: 0xf854f000 0x0 0x16d8 0x9000
>
> index 025 and 026 descriptors processed but not index 027.
>
> At this stage Tx DMA is
Hi Jose,
On 5/17/2018 7:43 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 15-05-2018 07:44, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/10/2018 9:15 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
On 10-05-2018 16:08, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/10/2018 7:59 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 10-05-2018 09:55, Jose Abreu
Hi Bhadram,
On 15-05-2018 07:44, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On 5/10/2018 9:15 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10-05-2018 16:08, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>>> Hi Jose,
>>>
>>> On 5/10/2018 7:59 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 10-05-2018 09:55, Jose Abreu wrote:
> ++net
Hi Jose,
On 5/10/2018 9:15 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
On 10-05-2018 16:08, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi Jose,
On 5/10/2018 7:59 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 10-05-2018 09:55, Jose Abreu wrote:
++net-dev
Hi Bhadram,
On 09-05-2018 12:03, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for responding.
Tr
On 10-05-2018 16:08, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On 5/10/2018 7:59 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi Bhadram,
>>
>> On 10-05-2018 09:55, Jose Abreu wrote:
>>> ++net-dev
>>>
>>> Hi Bhadram,
>>>
>>> On 09-05-2018 12:03, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for responding.
Trie
Hi Jose,
On 5/10/2018 7:59 PM, Jose Abreu wrote:
Hi Bhadram,
On 10-05-2018 09:55, Jose Abreu wrote:
++net-dev
Hi Bhadram,
On 09-05-2018 12:03, Bhadram Varka wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for responding.
Tried below suggested way. Still observing the issue -
It seems stmmac has a bug in the RX side w
Hi Bhadram,
On 10-05-2018 09:55, Jose Abreu wrote:
> ++net-dev
>
> Hi Bhadram,
>
> On 09-05-2018 12:03, Bhadram Varka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for responding.
>>
>> Tried below suggested way. Still observing the issue -
> It seems stmmac has a bug in the RX side when using TSO which is
> causing
++net-dev
Hi Bhadram,
On 09-05-2018 12:03, Bhadram Varka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> Tried below suggested way. Still observing the issue -
It seems stmmac has a bug in the RX side when using TSO which is
causing all the RX descriptors to be consumed. The stmmac_rx()
function wil
Hello Jie
On 12/14/2016 5:05 AM, Jie Deng wrote:
Hi Peppe,
On 2016/12/12 22:17, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
Hi David
On 12/7/2016 7:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
Giuseppe and Alexandre,
There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
driver lately and both of you are list
Hi David,
Giuseppe and Alexandre,
There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
driver lately and both of you are listed as the maintainers.
I really need prompt and conclusive reviews of these patch submissions
from you, and participatio
Hi Peppe,
On 2016/12/12 22:17, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hi David
>
> On 12/7/2016 7:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Giuseppe and Alexandre,
>>
>> There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
>> driver lately and both of you are listed as the maintainers.
>>
>> I reall
Hi David
On 12/7/2016 7:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
Giuseppe and Alexandre,
There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
driver lately and both of you are listed as the maintainers.
I really need prompt and conclusive reviews of these patch submissions
from you, and p
(resend with netdev included)
On 12/09/2016 05:29 PM, Jie Deng wrote:
>
> On 2016/12/9 18:50, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>> Hello Jie Deng
>>
>>
>> In your cover letter you wrote
>>
>> dwc-eth-xxx.x
>> The DWC ethernet core layer (DWC ECL). This layer contains codes
>> can be shared by different DWC s
Hello Jie Deng
In your cover letter you wrote
dwc-eth-xxx.x
The DWC ethernet core layer (DWC ECL). This layer contains codes
can be shared by different DWC series ethernet cores
Does this mean that code in dwc-eth-xxx.x is common to all
the different Synopsys IPs, GMAC, XGMAC and XLGMAC ?
R
On 2016/12/8 23:25, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexandre Torgue
> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:55:04 +0100
>
>> Maybe I forget some series. Do you have others in mind ?
> Please see the thread titled:
>
> "net: ethernet: Initial driver for Synopsys DWC XLGMAC"
>
> which seems to be discussing conso
On 12/08/2016 04:25 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Alexandre Torgue
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:55:04 +0100
Maybe I forget some series. Do you have others in mind ?
Please see the thread titled:
"net: ethernet: Initial driver for Synopsys DWC XLGMAC"
which seems to be discussing consolidatio
From: Alexandre Torgue
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:55:04 +0100
> Maybe I forget some series. Do you have others in mind ?
Please see the thread titled:
"net: ethernet: Initial driver for Synopsys DWC XLGMAC"
which seems to be discussing consolidation of various drivers
for the same IP core, of wh
Hi David,
On 12/07/2016 07:06 PM, David Miller wrote:
Giuseppe and Alexandre,
There are a lot of patches and discussions happening around the stammc
driver lately and both of you are listed as the maintainers.
I really need prompt and conclusive reviews of these patch submissions
from you, an
32 matches
Mail list logo
