From: Jesse Brandeburg
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:44:54 -0800
> While I agree that ethtool provides a similar functionality, ethtool
> was designed (particularly the ethtool -C/c commands) around one queue
> NICs. We can't change the output or functionality of the user
> interface without breaking
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:13:34 -0800
> The new interface you propose makes things inconsistent, since we have
> two separate configuration paths (sysfs and ethtool), and it would seem
> better to have per-queue awareness in ethtool, since there is a whole
> bunch of other
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Jesse Brandeburg
wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:13:34 -0800
> Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/15 00:01, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Kan Liang
>> >
>> > Network devices usually have many queues. Each queue has its own
>> > tx_usecs options. Currentl
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:13:34 -0800
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 01/12/15 00:01, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > Network devices usually have many queues. Each queue has its own
> > tx_usecs options. Currently, we can only set all the queues with same
> > value by ethtool.
On 01/12/15 00:01, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> Network devices usually have many queues. Each queue has its own
> tx_usecs options. Currently, we can only set all the queues with same
> value by ethtool. This patch expose the tx_usecs in sysfs. So the user
> can set/get per q