On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Amir Vadai wrote:
>
>> -#define tc_single_action(_exts) \
>> - (list_is_singular(&(_exts)->actions))
>> +#define tc_no_actions(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 0)
>> +#define tc_single_action(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 1)
>
> Should remove the '&' here.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> As pointed out by Jamal, an action could be shared by
> multiple filters, so we can't use list to chain them
> any more after we get rid of the original tc_action.
> Instead, we could just save pointers to these actions
> in tcf_exts, since they
