On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Amir Vadai <ami...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> -#define tc_single_action(_exts) \ >> - (list_is_singular(&(_exts)->actions)) >> +#define tc_no_actions(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 0) >> +#define tc_single_action(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 1) > > Should remove the '&' here.
Good catch! I even didn't notice the '&' there. :-/ I will wait for Jamal's comments before sending v2. Thanks.