On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Amir Vadai <ami...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -#define tc_single_action(_exts) \
>> -       (list_is_singular(&(_exts)->actions))
>> +#define tc_no_actions(_exts)  (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 0)
>> +#define tc_single_action(_exts) (&(_exts)->nr_actions == 1)
>
> Should remove the '&' here.

Good catch! I even didn't notice the '&' there. :-/

I will wait for Jamal's comments before sending v2.

Thanks.

Reply via email to