On 2021-04-09 9:43 a.m., Petr Machata wrote:
Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
Does the spectrum not support multiple actions?
e.g with a policy like:
match blah action trap action drop skip_sw
Trap drops implicitly. We need a "trap, but don't drop". Expressed in
terms of existing actions it wou
Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
> On 2021-04-09 7:03 a.m., Petr Machata wrote:
>> Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
>>
>>> I am concerned about adding new opcodes which only make sense if you
>>> offload (or make sense only if you are running in s/w).
>>>
>>> Those opcodes are intended to be generic abstract
On 2021-04-09 7:03 a.m., Petr Machata wrote:
Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
I am concerned about adding new opcodes which only make sense if you
offload (or make sense only if you are running in s/w).
Those opcodes are intended to be generic abstractions so the dispatcher
can decide what to do nex
On 2021-04-08 5:25 p.m., Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:05:07 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 2021-04-08 9:38 a.m., Petr Machata wrote:
The TC action "trap" is used to instruct the HW datapath to drop the
matched packet and transfer it for processing in the SW pipeline. If
instead
Jamal Hadi Salim writes:
> I am concerned about adding new opcodes which only make sense if you
> offload (or make sense only if you are running in s/w).
>
> Those opcodes are intended to be generic abstractions so the dispatcher
> can decide what to do next. Adding things that are specific onl
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:05:07 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 2021-04-08 9:38 a.m., Petr Machata wrote:
> > The TC action "trap" is used to instruct the HW datapath to drop the
> > matched packet and transfer it for processing in the SW pipeline. If
> > instead it is desirable to forward the packe
Hi Petr,
On 2021-04-08 9:38 a.m., Petr Machata wrote:
The TC action "trap" is used to instruct the HW datapath to drop the
matched packet and transfer it for processing in the SW pipeline. If
instead it is desirable to forward the packet and transferring a _copy_ to
the SW pipeline, there is no