On 16-06-30 08:53 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:40:57PM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 16-06-30 03:52 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:57:21AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16-06-30 12:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 a
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:40:57PM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 16-06-30 03:52 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:57:21AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On 16-06-30 12:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:13:55AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com
On 16-06-30 03:52 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:57:21AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 16-06-30 12:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:13:55AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
On 6/29/2016 11:25 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Why not to have 2 modes:
> 1) lagacy - the current solution, blackbox eswitch, undefined behaviour
> 2) switchdev - with representors, all features possible as on physical
> switches, whitebox eswitch configured using standard tools?
yep, thi
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:57:21AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 16-06-30 12:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:13:55AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/29/2016 11:25 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:04:39AM CEST, john.fastab...@g
On 16-06-30 12:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:13:55AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/29/2016 11:25 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:04:39AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16-06-29 08:35 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 09:13:55AM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 6/29/2016 11:25 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:04:39AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On 16-06-29 08:35 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-29 03:09 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>On 16-06
On 6/29/2016 11:25 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:04:39AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16-06-29 08:35 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-29 03:09 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-29 02:33 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John Fastabend
wro
Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 06:04:39AM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 16-06-29 08:35 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-06-29 03:09 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>> On 16-06-29 02:33 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> On 16-06-29 07:48 AM,
On 16-06-29 08:35 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16-06-29 03:09 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-06-29 02:33 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John Fastabend
>>> wrote:
On 16-06-29 07:48 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/28/2016 10:31 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>
On 16-06-29 03:09 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16-06-29 02:33 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John Fastabend
>> wrote:
>>> On 16-06-29 07:48 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 6/28/2016 10:31 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16-06-28 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> W
On 16-06-29 02:33 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John Fastabend
> wrote:
>> On 16-06-29 07:48 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On 6/28/2016 10:31 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-28 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> Why?! Please, leave legacy be legacy. Use the new mod
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> On 16-06-29 07:48 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On 6/28/2016 10:31 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>> On 16-06-28 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Why?! Please, leave legacy be legacy. Use the new mode for
implementing new features. Don't make t
On 16-06-29 07:48 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/28/2016 10:31 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-06-28 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>
>>> Why?! Please, leave legacy be legacy. Use the new mode for
>>> implementing new features. Don't make things any more complicated :(
>>>
>> OK so how I read this
On 6/28/2016 10:31 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-28 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Why?! Please, leave legacy be legacy. Use the new mode for implementing new
features. Don't make things any more complicated :(
OK so how I read this is there are two things going on that are being
conflated
On 6/28/2016 7:19 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-28 03:25 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 6/28/2016 8:57 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
hmm so in the hardware I have there is actually a l2 table and various
other tables so I don't have any issue with doing table setup. I would
like to see a table_crea
On 16-06-28 12:12 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:04:00PM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/28/2016 11:46 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 07:19:06PM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16-06-28 09:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16
Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:04:00PM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 6/28/2016 11:46 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 07:19:06PM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>On 16-06-28 09:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-28 03:25 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>On 6/28/2016
On 6/28/2016 11:46 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 07:19:06PM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16-06-28 09:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-28 03:25 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 6/28/2016 8:57 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-27 09:07 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
Add the
Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 07:19:06PM CEST, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 16-06-28 09:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-06-28 03:25 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On 6/28/2016 8:57 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-27 09:07 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Add the commands to set and show the m
On 16-06-28 09:19 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16-06-28 03:25 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On 6/28/2016 8:57 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>>> On 16-06-27 09:07 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
Add the commands to set and show the mode of SRIOV E-Switch, two
modes are supported:
* legacy :
On 16-06-28 03:25 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 6/28/2016 8:57 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> On 16-06-27 09:07 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>>> Add the commands to set and show the mode of SRIOV E-Switch, two
>>> modes are supported:
>>>
>>> * legacy : operating in the "old" L2 based mode (DMAC --> VF v
Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:07:21PM CEST, sae...@mellanox.com wrote:
>From: Or Gerlitz
>
>Add the commands to set and show the mode of SRIOV E-Switch,
>two modes are supported:
>
>* legacy : operating in the "old" L2 based mode (DMAC --> VF vport)
>* offloads : offloading SW rules/policy (e.g Bridge
On 6/28/2016 8:57 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
On 16-06-27 09:07 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
Add the commands to set and show the mode of SRIOV E-Switch, two modes are
supported:
* legacy : operating in the "old" L2 based mode (DMAC --> VF vport)
* offloads : offloading SW rules/policy (e.g Bridg
On 16-06-27 09:07 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Or Gerlitz
>
> Add the commands to set and show the mode of SRIOV E-Switch,
> two modes are supported:
>
> * legacy : operating in the "old" L2 based mode (DMAC --> VF vport)
> * offloads : offloading SW rules/policy (e.g Bridge/FDB or TC/Flo
25 matches
Mail list logo