On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:51:52AM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> >> +/* Function to safely get fn->sernum for passed in rt
> >> + * and store result in passed in cookie.
> >> + * Return true if we can get cookie safely
> >> + * Return false if not
> >> + */
> >> +static inline bool rt6_ge
Hi Martin,
>> +/* Function to safely get fn->sernum for passed in rt
>> + * and store result in passed in cookie.
>> + * Return true if we can get cookie safely
>> + * Return false if not
>> + */
>> +static inline bool rt6_get_cookie_safe(const struct rt6_info *rt,
>> +
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:36:55PM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang
>
> We currently keep rt->rt6i_node pointing to the fib6_node for the route.
> And some functions make use of this pointer to dereference the fib6_node
> from rt structure, e.g. rt6_check(). However, as there is neither
> r
