On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:32:19AM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the patch late yesterday and applied it.
>
> Running fine now for 12 hours under active load.
Thank you.
> Recommend the patch be rolled into the tarball,
> or a notation added to the release page as
Hi,
I found the patch late yesterday and applied it.
Running fine now for 12 hours under active load.
Recommend the patch be rolled into the tarball,
or a notation added to the release page as this
one has severe consequences.
Thank You!
At 09:49 6/1/2015 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>Hi,
>
>O
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:00:21AM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> [cc: Willy Tarreau]
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:26 AM, wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Apoligies if I have submitted to the wrong lists.
> >
> > Encountered a regression in
> > 2.6.32.66 relative to 2.6.32.65.
> >
> > Crash eight mi
[cc: Willy Tarreau]
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:26 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apoligies if I have submitted to the wrong lists.
>
> Encountered a regression in
> 2.6.32.66 relative to 2.6.32.65.
>
> Crash eight minutes after boot.
>
> Will responded with additional details
> if the OOPS is not suffice
Hello,
Apoligies if I have submitted to the wrong lists.
Encountered a regression in
2.6.32.66 relative to 2.6.32.65.
Crash eight minutes after boot.
Will responded with additional details
if the OOPS is not sufficent.
Best Regards
Linux version 2.6.32.66 (scrubbed) (gcc version 4.4.7 2012031
