Hi,
I found the patch late yesterday and applied it.
Running fine now for 12 hours under active load.
Recommend the patch be rolled into the tarball,
or a notation added to the release page as this
one has severe consequences.
Thank You!
At 09:49 6/1/2015 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:00:21AM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
>> [cc: Willy Tarreau]
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:26 AM,
><starlight.201...@binnacle.cx> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Apoligies if I have submitted to the wrong lists.
>> >
>> > Encountered a regression in
>> > 2.6.32.66 relative to 2.6.32.65.
>> >
>> > Crash eight minutes after boot.
>> >
>> > Will responded with additional details
>> > if the OOPS is not sufficent.
>> >
>> > Best Regards
>> >
>>
>> Did you bisect it?
>
>Eric Dumazet notified me that of something possibly similar due to
>a mistake I made when backporting a fix by hand.
>
>Please apply the following patch to see if it fixes the problem
>:
>
>diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>
>index 5339f066234b..d1e2895bb63c 100644
>
>--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
>@@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
> */
> if (tskb && (tcp_send_head(sk) || tcp_memory_pressure)) {
> coalesce:
>- TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags |= TCPCB_FLAG_FIN;
>+ TCP_SKB_CB(tskb)->flags |= TCPCB_FLAG_FIN;
> TCP_SKB_CB(tskb)->end_seq++;
> tp->write_seq++;
> if (!tcp_send_head(sk)) {
>
>Thanks,
>Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
