From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:50:40 +0300
> These checks are off by one. These are just sanity checks and we don't
> ever pass invalid values for "encap_type" so it's harmless.
>
> Fixes: 9b4108012517 ("sfc: insert catch-all filters for encapsulated traffic")
> Signed-off-by: Dan
On 01/02/17 13:24, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 01/02/17 08:50, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> These checks are off by one. These are just sanity checks and we don't
>> ever pass invalid values for "encap_type" so it's harmless.
>>
>> Fixes: 9b4108012517 ("sfc: insert catch-all filters for encapsulated
>> tr
On 01/02/17 08:50, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> These checks are off by one. These are just sanity checks and we don't
> ever pass invalid values for "encap_type" so it's harmless.
>
> Fixes: 9b4108012517 ("sfc: insert catch-all filters for encapsulated traffic")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
One of t
These checks are off by one. These are just sanity checks and we don't
ever pass invalid values for "encap_type" so it's harmless.
Fixes: 9b4108012517 ("sfc: insert catch-all filters for encapsulated traffic")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/n
