On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 22:29 +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Commit 7b8179c780a1a ("iproute2: Add new command to ip link to
> enable/disable VF spoof check") tried to add support for
> IFLA_VF_SPOOFCHK in a backwards-compatible manner, but aparently overdid
> it: parse_rtattr_nested() handles missing at
Commit 7b8179c780a1a ("iproute2: Add new command to ip link to
enable/disable VF spoof check") tried to add support for
IFLA_VF_SPOOFCHK in a backwards-compatible manner, but aparently overdid
it: parse_rtattr_nested() handles missing attributes perfectly fine in
that it will leave the relevant fie
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:03:49PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but it looks
> overly complicated. Instead rely upon parse_rtattr_nested() to assign
> the relevant pointer if requested rtattr fields are present.
In order to validate correctness
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:36:09PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:00:08PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> >> > Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but i
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:36:09PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:00:08PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> >> > Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but i
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:00:08PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
>> > Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but it looks
>> > overly complicated. Instead rely upon parse_rtattr_nes
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:00:08PM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but it looks
> > overly complicated. Instead rely upon parse_rtattr_nested() to assign
> > the relevant pointer if requested rta
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but it looks
> overly complicated. Instead rely upon parse_rtattr_nested() to assign
> the relevant pointer if requested rtattr fields are present.
I'm not sure if newer iproute2 utilities a
Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but it looks
overly complicated. Instead rely upon parse_rtattr_nested() to assign
the relevant pointer if requested rtattr fields are present.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter
---
ip/ipaddress.c | 44 ++--
1