On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:03:49PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > Not sure whether I misinterpret commit 7b8179c780a1a, but it looks > overly complicated. Instead rely upon parse_rtattr_nested() to assign > the relevant pointer if requested rtattr fields are present.
In order to validate correctness of this patch, I compiled a kernel which does not export IFLA_VF_SPOOFCHK and verified correct functionality. Is there anything else I could do in order to convince you to accept these patches? Thanks, Phil
