Hi Jiri,
Jiri Pirko writes:
> Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:32:13PM CET, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>>Hi Vivien
>>
>>> -static bool dsa_slave_dev_check(struct net_device *dev)
>>> -{
>>> - return dev->netdev_ops == &dsa_slave_netdev_ops;
>>> -}
>>
>>Where is the equivalent of this happening? Where do we
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:32:05PM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Lunn writes:
>
> >> -static bool dsa_slave_dev_check(struct net_device *dev)
> >> -{
> >> - return dev->netdev_ops == &dsa_slave_netdev_ops;
> >> -}
> >
> > Where is the equivalent of this happening? Where d
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Lunn writes:
>> -static bool dsa_slave_dev_check(struct net_device *dev)
>> -{
>> -return dev->netdev_ops == &dsa_slave_netdev_ops;
>> -}
>
> Where is the equivalent of this happening? Where do we check that the
> interface added to the bridge is part of the switch?
Why sh
Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:32:13PM CET, and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>Hi Vivien
>
>> -static bool dsa_slave_dev_check(struct net_device *dev)
>> -{
>> -return dev->netdev_ops == &dsa_slave_netdev_ops;
>> -}
>
>Where is the equivalent of this happening? Where do we check that the
>interface added to the b
Hi Vivien
> -static bool dsa_slave_dev_check(struct net_device *dev)
> -{
> - return dev->netdev_ops == &dsa_slave_netdev_ops;
> -}
Where is the equivalent of this happening? Where do we check that the
interface added to the bridge is part of the switch?
> -int dsa_slave_netdevice_event(stru
Add a new dsa_slave_bridge_if function to handle the
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_IF switchdev attribute.
Thus remove the code related to the netdev notifier block.
Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot
---
net/dsa/dsa.c | 7
net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 -
net/dsa/slave.c| 113 +++
