On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:15:33AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > + dev_warn(dev->dev,
> > > + "Using legacy switch \"phy-mode\" missing on
> > > port %d node. Please update y
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > + dev_warn(dev->dev,
> > +"Using legacy switch \"phy-mode\" missing on
> > port %d node. Please update your device tree.\n",
This is inside ksz8795_port_setup.
> That messag
> + dev_warn(dev->dev,
> + "Using legacy switch \"phy-mode\" missing on
> port %d node. Please update your device tree.\n",
That message seems mangled.
> + if (!p->interface) {
> + if (dev->compat_in
On 04/09/2020 10:14:42+0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.txt says that the phy-mode
> property should be specified on port nodes. However, the microchip
> drivers read it from the switch node.
>
> Let the driver use the per-port property and fall back to th
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.txt says that the phy-mode
property should be specified on port nodes. However, the microchip
drivers read it from the switch node.
Let the driver use the per-port property and fall back to the old
location with a warning.
Fix in-tree users.
Signed-o
