Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: two more missing bh disable

2016-05-04 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:27:29 -0700 > From: Eric Dumazet > > percpu_counter only have protection against preemption. > > TCP stack uses them possibly from BH, so we need BH protection > in contexts that could be run in process context > > Fixes: c10d9310edf5 ("tcp: do not

[PATCH net-next] tcp: two more missing bh disable

2016-05-04 Thread Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet percpu_counter only have protection against preemption. TCP stack uses them possibly from BH, so we need BH protection in contexts that could be run in process context Fixes: c10d9310edf5 ("tcp: do not assume TCP code is non preemptible") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet --- net