From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:27:29 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> 
> percpu_counter only have protection against preemption.
> 
> TCP stack uses them possibly from BH, so we need BH protection
> in contexts that could be run in process context
> 
> Fixes: c10d9310edf5 ("tcp: do not assume TCP code is non preemptible")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

Applied.

Reply via email to