On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:30:25PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:22:38AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > Cc'ing linux-s...@vger.kernel.org.
> >
> > What do you think of this vers
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:22:38AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > Cc'ing linux-s...@vger.kernel.org.
>
> What do you think of this version, which I think is a little cleaner?
It splits up the argument parsing from the
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:42:31PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Cc'ing linux-s...@vger.kernel.org.
What do you think of this version, which I think is a little cleaner?
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 9a767f35971865..6ce460428af9f3 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket
Cc'ing linux-s...@vger.kernel.org.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:38:58PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> This sockopt accepts two kinds of parameters, using struct
> sctp_sack_info and struct sctp_assoc_value. The mentioned commit didn't
> notice an implicit cast from the smaller (latter) str
This sockopt accepts two kinds of parameters, using struct
sctp_sack_info and struct sctp_assoc_value. The mentioned commit didn't
notice an implicit cast from the smaller (latter) struct to the bigger
one (former) when copying the data from the user space, which now leads
to an attempt to write be
