Cc'ing [email protected].
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:38:58PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> This sockopt accepts two kinds of parameters, using struct
> sctp_sack_info and struct sctp_assoc_value. The mentioned commit didn't
> notice an implicit cast from the smaller (latter) struct to the bigger
> one (former) when copying the data from the user space, which now leads
> to an attempt to write beyond the buffer (because it assumes the storing
> buffer is bigger than the parameter itself).
>
> Fix it by giving it a special buffer if the smaller struct is used by
> the application.
>
> Fixes: ebb25defdc17 ("sctp: pass a kernel pointer to
> sctp_setsockopt_delayed_ack")
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/sctp/socket.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index
> 9a767f35971865f46b39131fc8d96d8c3c2aa1a8..b71c36af7687247b4fc9e160219b76f5c41b2fe2
> 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -2756,6 +2756,7 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_delayed_ack(struct sock *sk,
> {
> struct sctp_sock *sp = sctp_sk(sk);
> struct sctp_association *asoc;
> + struct sctp_sack_info _params;
>
> if (optlen == sizeof(struct sctp_sack_info)) {
> if (params->sack_delay == 0 && params->sack_freq == 0)
> @@ -2767,7 +2768,9 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_delayed_ack(struct sock *sk,
> "Use struct sctp_sack_info instead\n",
> current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
>
> - if (params->sack_delay == 0)
> + memcpy(&_params, params, sizeof(struct sctp_assoc_value));
> + params = &_params;
> + if (((struct sctp_assoc_value *)params)->assoc_value == 0)
> params->sack_freq = 1;
> else
> params->sack_freq = 0;
> --
> 2.25.4
>
