On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:01:24PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 01:02 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
[...]
> >
> >>>@@ -621,7 +623,7 @@ static int fib_check_nh(struct fib_config *cfg, struct
> >>>fib_info *fi,
> >>> /* It is not necessary, but requires a bit of think
On 06/03/2015 01:02 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:25:09AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 06/02/2015 08:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
[...]
Though there were some that preferred not to have a configuration option
and to make this behavior the default when it was discus
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 22:34, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:04:06PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 20:27, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy G
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:04:06PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 20:27, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> > > wrote:
> > > > This feature is only enabled w
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:03:53PM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Andy Gospodarek
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> >> wrote:
> >> > This feature is only enabled with t
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 20:27, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> > wrote:
> > > This feature is only enabled with the new sysctl set (default is off):
> > > net.core.kill_routes_on_linkdown
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:25:09AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 06/02/2015 08:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
[...]
> >Though there were some that preferred not to have a configuration option
> >and to make this behavior the default when it was discussed in Ottawa
> >earlier this year since "i
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Andy Gospodarek
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
>> wrote:
>> > This feature is only enabled with the new sysctl set (default is off):
>> > net.core.kill_routes_on_linkdown =
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> wrote:
> > This feature is only enabled with the new sysctl set (default is off):
> > net.core.kill_routes_on_linkdown = 1
>
> One more thing, sorry. This feature is typically imple
On 06/02/2015 08:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
interface associated with the next-hop.
Before this patch any link-failure on an interface that was serving a
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:12:11AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Andy Gospodarek
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:40:26AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Andy Gospodarek
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:03:23PM
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
wrote:
> This feature is only enabled with the new sysctl set (default is off):
> net.core.kill_routes_on_linkdown = 1
One more thing, sorry. This feature is typically implemented today in
user-space on a per-interface basis. The example I'm think
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Andy Gospodarek
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:40:26AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Andy Gospodarek
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:03:23PM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gosp
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:40:26AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Andy Gospodarek
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:03:23PM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> >> wrote:
> >> > This patch adds the ability to have
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:16:27AM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:46:22AM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:21:31AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Andy Gospodarek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:03:23PM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
>> wrote:
>> > This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
>> > not a particular route should be use
On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 11:02 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:46:22AM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:21:31AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 09:53 -04
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:46:22AM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:21:31AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > > On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 0
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:03:23PM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
> wrote:
> > This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> > not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> > interface associated wit
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:46:22AM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:21:31AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > > On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 09:53 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:07:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:21:31AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 09:53 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:07:19PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the ability to
On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 10:21 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> > On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 09:53 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:07:19PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > > > This patch adds the ability to have th
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:03:48PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Di, 2015-06-02 at 23:07 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > index 6f5f71f..5bd953c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netde
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 09:53 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:07:19PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > > This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> > > not a particular route
On Mi, 2015-06-03 at 09:53 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:07:19PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> > not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> > interface associated with t
On Di, 2015-06-02 at 23:07 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 6f5f71f..5bd953c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2986,6 +2986,7 @@ int dev_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struc
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:07:19PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> interface associated with the next-hop.
>
> Before this patch any link-failure on an in
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:35:09AM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 05:07, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> > not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> > interface associated
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 05:07, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> interface associated with the next-hop.
>
> Before this patch any link-failure on an interface tha
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek
wrote:
> This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
> not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
> interface associated with the next-hop.
>
> Before this patch any link-failure on an interface th
This patch adds the ability to have the Linux kernel track whether or
not a particular route should be used based on the link-status of the
interface associated with the next-hop.
Before this patch any link-failure on an interface that was serving as a
gateway for some systems could result in thos
31 matches
Mail list logo
