On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 20:27, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:15:55AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Andy Gospodarek > > <go...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > > > This feature is only enabled with the new sysctl set (default is off): > > > net.core.kill_routes_on_linkdown = 1 > > > > One more thing, sorry. This feature is typically implemented today in > > user-space on a per-interface basis. The example I'm thinking of is > > Quagga's "link-detect" directive which goes on an interface. Should > > this be a bool on each interface in systcl? That would let user not > > enable on selected interfaces. > That would not be my preference. > > I'm willing to investigate the per-namespace support if Hannes would > like and add switchdev support for v2, but would prefer this not become > that granular.
Actually, this idea also came to my mind: flagging specific routes if they are eligible to suppress if the link is down. Bye, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
