From: Davide Caratti
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:50:57 +0100
> When tca_action_flush() calls the action walk() and gets an error,
> a successful call to nla_nest_start() is not followed by a call to
> nla_nest_cancel(). It's harmless, as the skb is freed in the error
> path - but it's worth to fix
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 10:31 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 18-02-15 09:50 AM, Davide Caratti wrote:
> > When tca_action_flush() calls the action walk() and gets an error,
> > a successful call to nla_nest_start() is not followed by a call to
> > nla_nest_cancel(). It's harmless, as the skb is
On 18-02-15 09:50 AM, Davide Caratti wrote:
When tca_action_flush() calls the action walk() and gets an error,
a successful call to nla_nest_start() is not followed by a call to
nla_nest_cancel(). It's harmless, as the skb is freed in the error
path - but it's worth to fix this unbalance.
Kind
When tca_action_flush() calls the action walk() and gets an error,
a successful call to nla_nest_start() is not followed by a call to
nla_nest_cancel(). It's harmless, as the skb is freed in the error
path - but it's worth to fix this unbalance.
Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti
---
net/sched/act_ap
