Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-30 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:34:44PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 7/28/2020 5:28 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > > On 7/28/2020 9:28 AM, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy > >>> > >>>

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-28 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 7/28/2020 5:28 PM, Doug Berger wrote: > On 7/28/2020 9:28 AM, Ioana Ciornei wrote: >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy >>> >>>> I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention >>>> the new pat

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-28 Thread Doug Berger
On 7/28/2020 9:28 AM, Ioana Ciornei wrote: >> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy >> >>> I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention >>> the new path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/ne

RE: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-28 Thread Ioana Ciornei
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy > > > I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention > > the new path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/net/phy': > > F: drivers/net/phy/adin.c > &

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-28 Thread Andrew Lunn
> I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention the new > path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/net/phy': > F: drivers/net/phy/adin.c > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xgene.c > F: drivers/net/phy/ > F: drivers/net/phy/marvell1

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-28 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:42:22PM +, Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy > > > > RFC Because it needs 0-day build testing > > > > The directory drivers/net/phy is getting rather cluttered with the growing >

RE: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-28 Thread Ioana Ciornei
> Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy > > RFC Because it needs 0-day build testing > > The directory drivers/net/phy is getting rather cluttered with the growing > number of MDIO bus drivers and PHY device drivers. We also have one PCS > driver

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-27 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:05:34PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:47:28 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > RFC Because it needs 0-day build testing > > Looks like allmodconfig falls over on patches 2 and 3. > > make[6]: *** No rule to make target 'drivers/net/phy/phy/mscc/mscc_pt

Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-27 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:47:28 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > RFC Because it needs 0-day build testing Looks like allmodconfig falls over on patches 2 and 3. make[6]: *** No rule to make target 'drivers/net/phy/phy/mscc/mscc_ptp.o', needed by 'drivers/net/phy/phy/mscc/mscc.o'. Stop.

[PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy

2020-07-27 Thread Andrew Lunn
RFC Because it needs 0-day build testing The directory drivers/net/phy is getting rather cluttered with the growing number of MDIO bus drivers and PHY device drivers. We also have one PCS driver and more are expected soon. Restructure the directory, moving MDIO bus drivers into /mdio. PHY driver