On 7/28/2020 5:28 PM, Doug Berger wrote:
> On 7/28/2020 9:28 AM, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy
>>>
>>>> I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention
>>>> the new path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/net/phy':
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/adin.c
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xgene.c
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-mvusb.c
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/dp83640*
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/sfp*
>>>> F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xpcs.c
>>>
>>> Hi Ioana
>>>
>>> Thanks, I will take care of that.
>>>
>>>> Other than that, the new 'drivers/net/phy/phy/' path is somewhat
>>>> repetitive but unfortunately I do not have another better suggestion.
>>>
>>> Me neither.
>>>
>>> I wonder if we are looking at the wrong part of the patch.
>>> drivers/net/X/phy/
>>> drivers/net/X/mdio/
>>> drivers/net/X/pcs/
>>>
>>> Question is, what would X be?
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>
>> It may not be a popular suggestion but can't we take the drivers/net/phy,
>> drivers/net/pcs and drivers/net/mdio route?
+1
--
Florian
