RE: [PATCH 2.6.16] tg3: 40-bit DMA workaround part 2

2006-03-18 Thread Michael Chan
David S. Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 06:16:31 + > > > That workaround should be in the pci code as it affects any pci > > device behind that bridge, not just tg3 ones. > > We don't have any infrastructure to do that, even if it > was p

Re: [PATCH 2.6.16] tg3: 40-bit DMA workaround part 2

2006-03-17 Thread David S. Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 06:16:31 + > That workaround should be in the pci code as it affects any pci > device behind that bridge, not just tg3 ones. We don't have any infrastructure to do that, even if it was practical. - To unsubscribe from this lis

Re: [PATCH 2.6.16] tg3: 40-bit DMA workaround part 2

2006-03-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:24:56PM -0800, Michael Chan wrote: > The 40-bit DMA workaround recently implemented for 5714, 5715, and > 5780 needs to be expanded because there may be other tg3 devices > behind the EPB Express to PCIX bridge in the 5780 class device. > > For example, some 4-port card

[PATCH 2.6.16] tg3: 40-bit DMA workaround part 2

2006-03-17 Thread Michael Chan
The 40-bit DMA workaround recently implemented for 5714, 5715, and 5780 needs to be expanded because there may be other tg3 devices behind the EPB Express to PCIX bridge in the 5780 class device. For example, some 4-port card or mother board designs have 5704 behind the 5714. All devices behind t