From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:46:40 +0200
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 22:24, Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ard,
>> > > Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
>> > >
>> >
>> > Why?
>> >
>> The netdev variant is usable on any context since it disa
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 01:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 22:24, Ilias Apalodimas
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ard,
> > > > Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why?
> > >
> > The netdev variant is usable on any context since it di
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 22:24, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
> > > Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
> > >
> >
> > Why?
> >
> The netdev variant is usable on any context since it disables interrupts.
> The napi variant of the call is supposed to be used un
Hi Ard,
> > Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
> >
>
> Why?
>
The netdev variant is usable on any context since it disables interrupts.
The napi variant of the call is supposed to be used under softirq context
only
> > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
> > -
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 11:27, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
>
Why?
> Fixes: 4acb20b46214 ("net: socionext: different approach on DMA")
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 11 +++
Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
Fixes: 4acb20b46214 ("net: socionext: different approach on DMA")
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dri
