On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:31:49 -0700
>
> > Maybe it is time to remove BIC?
>
> I don't see any compelling reason, the same could be said
> of the other experimental protocols we include in the tree.
I agre
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:31:49 -0700
> Maybe it is time to remove BIC?
I don't see any compelling reason, the same could be said
of the other experimental protocols we include in the tree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe net
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:27:18 -0700
>
> Please make patches against my net-2.6 tree, I already
> made changes in this area.
>
> > Remove the initial slow start overr
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:27:18 -0700
Please make patches against my net-2.6 tree, I already
made changes in this area.
> Remove the initial slow start override from TCP cubic.
> The old code caused Cubic to start out in slow start mode, which
> is less
Remove the initial slow start override from TCP cubic.
The old code caused Cubic to start out in slow start mode, which
is less agressive but caused slow performance.
The administrator can override initial slow start threshold on any
TCP congestion control method via the TCP route metrics.
Signed