On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:31:49 -0700
>
> > Maybe it is time to remove BIC?
>
> I don't see any compelling reason, the same could be said
> of the other experimental protocols we include in the tree.
I agree bic should be kept. As I pointed out, if someone did want
to set the bic/cubic initial_ssthresh to 100 globally, my tests
showed bic's performance during the initial slow start phase was
far superior to cubic's. I don't know if this is a bug or a
feature with cubic.
-Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
