You're taking my suggestion way too far.
Just replicate gem_interrupt() inline into gem_poll_controller(),
removing the irrelevant bits by hand. You shouldn't need to
modify gem_poll() at all, just as in your original patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Geoff Levand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:13:57 -0700
>
>
>>@@ -970,7 +970,8 @@
>> /* gem_interrupt is safe to reentrance so no need
>> * to disable_irq here.
>> */
>>- gem_interrupt(dev->irq, dev, NULL);
>>+ if(gem_interr
On Friday 26 August 2005 12:13, Jiri Benc wrote:
> You mentioned problem with hooks in scanning/association/etc. Probably
> everybody involved in this discussion knows it but I think it is worth
> saying it: This is one of the most important things in a new ieee80211
> layer. Unfortunately, it seem
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:34:49 -0700
And for the record, I grepped a great deal of dev_holds, but
associating a particular get with a put is making my head hurt :)
How about the one, and only one, in that file that adds the SKBs t
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:34:49 -0700
> And for the record, I grepped a great deal of dev_holds, but
> associating a particular get with a put is making my head hurt :)
How about the one, and only one, in that file that adds the SKBs to
the input_pkt_queue lis
David S. Miller wrote:
netif_rx() grabs the device reference, this wasn't hard
to figure out, I just grep'd and you could have done so
as well :-)
Ahh, ok. And it's safe to not hold it before then because
the net-device can't go away before or during it's call netif_rx...
And for the record,
netif_rx() grabs the device reference, this wasn't hard
to figure out, I just grep'd and you could have done so
as well :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-inf
In dev.c's process_backlog, there is code like this:
dev = skb->dev
netif_receive_skb(skb);
dev_put(dev);
Do you happen to know what piece of code takes this reference to
the device in the first place?
Also, why not make the co
--- Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Danial Thom wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Danial Thom wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I think the concensus is that 2.6 has made
> > >>
> > >>tr
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:55:27AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> Of course. Never found a motherboard yet with decent built-in
> NICs. The built-ins on this board are tg3 and they must be on
> a slow bus, because they cannot go faster than about 700Mbps
> (using big pkts).
There should be a number
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:49:12 -0300
> Eric, without questioning the merit of the changes David oposed to, his
> request for splitting the patch is reasonable, could you please do that?
Now that he's explained the SNMP case, it really isn't
nece
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:11:14 +0200
> The patch I suggested only changed the root pointer, moving to read_mostly
> section because it is really write once at boot, then read only.
I totally missed that, thanks for clarifying.
I'll apply your patch, thank
Andrew Morton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5131
Summary: Computer hangs when default-gw becomes unreachable
Kernel Version: 2.6.13-rc3-mm1
...
Right now I'm going to try 2.6.13-rc7 to see if the problem occurs there too.
T
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:10:45 -0400, Mike Kershaw wrote:
> It's archived off the sourceforge page (http://ipw2200.sourceforge.net
> or http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=38938)
I've found two threads regarding this; if anybody else is interested and
doesn't want to spend ages sea
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:07:07 -0400, Michael Wu wrote:
> http://aluminum.sourmilk.net/adm8211/index.php?path=netdev/
Looks good for the first view. Unfortunately I won't have enough time to
look closely until next week.
> - adm8211 supports shared key authentication, rtl8180-sa2400 only supports
Jeff:
I still do not see your point.
Calls to msec_delay() that you pointed us to resolve to msleep() and NOT
mdelay(). In addition we have the advantage of msec_delay() checking the
context (in the case the human verification was incorrect).
Ganesh.
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Garz
On Friday 26 August 2005 08:08, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:49:52 -0400, Michael Wu wrote:
> > I hope to submit the adm8211 driver for review soon, but there's a bunch
> > of code in the driver which probably belong in the ieee80211 code:
> >
> > - Duplicate frame removal
> > - Defini
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:24:14PM -0700, Malli Chilakala wrote:
> Backout watchdog task patch from John Linville
>
> Signed-off-by: Mallikarjuna R Chilakala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Venkatesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: John Ronciak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BTW, I think t
Note to all: please use this address when copying me regarding
upstream matters. It keeps my mailboxes better sorted...thanks!
Since I'm being called-out by name, I suppose I should add my
$0.02... :-)
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:38:35PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Malli Chilakala wrote:
> >Backo
On Friday 26 August 2005 05:04, Stefan Rompf wrote:
> > - AVS capture header in monitor mode
>
> there has been a discussion about AVS or radiotap header on the ipw list
> that resulted in the inclusion of radiotap definitions in James' latest
> patches for ieee80211. Radiotap requires a libpcap up
Benjamin LaHaise a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:11:14AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
The patch I suggested only changed the root pointer, moving to read_mostly
section because it is really write once at boot, then read only. This is
the same with slab pointers : they are hot objects (read/
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:11:14AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> The patch I suggested only changed the root pointer, moving to read_mostly
> section because it is really write once at boot, then read only. This is
> the same with slab pointers : they are hot objects (read/written all the
> time)
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 02:11:07PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:04:15 +0200, Stefan Rompf wrote:
> > there has been a discussion about AVS or radiotap header on the ipw list
>
> Does it have an archive on web? If so, could you post an address of that
> thread?
It's archived of
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:04:15 +0200, Stefan Rompf wrote:
> there has been a discussion about AVS or radiotap header on the ipw list
Does it have an archive on web? If so, could you post an address of that
thread?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:49:52 -0400, Michael Wu wrote:
> I hope to submit the adm8211 driver for review soon, but there's a bunch of
> code in the driver which probably belong in the ieee80211 code:
>
> - Duplicate frame removal
> - Definitions for all management payloads
> - SIOCSIWENCODEEXT and
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 15:51 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 15:04, David Hollis wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Question for you, I'm trying to setup my mdio_bus driver and I don't
> > know how I can get it registered at the appropriate time. I can't
> > read
> > the PHY IDs until after I'
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:30:26 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > add-seq-number.patch
> > Adds sequence numbers to transmitted frames.
>
> any security implications here, as with TCP sequence numbers?
802.11 sequence numbers are intended solely for duplicate frame
filtering (chapter 9.2.9 in IEEE 8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5131
>
>Summary: Computer hangs when default-gw becomes unreachable
> Kernel Version: 2.6.13-rc3-mm1
>
> ...
>
> Right now I'm going to try 2.6.13-rc7 to see if the problem occurs there too.
>
Thanks. It wo
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:31:06 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > ieee-dev-alignment.patch
>
> +static inline void *ieee80211_dev_to_priv(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + return (char *)dev +
> + ((sizeof(struct net_device) + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST)
> + & ~NETDEV_AL
Kernel connector - new userspace <-> kernel space easy to
use communication module which implements easy to use bidirectional
message bus using netlink as it's backend.
Connector was created to eliminate complex skb handling both in send and
receive message bus direction.
Connector driver adds pos
Hi,
Am Freitag 26 August 2005 02:49 schrieb Michael Wu:
> I hope to submit the adm8211 driver for review soon, but there's a bunch of
> code in the driver which probably belong in the ieee80211 code:
[...]
> - AVS capture header in monitor mode
there has been a discussion about AVS or radiotap h
On 8/26/05, Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David S. Miller a écrit :
> > From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 03:07:06 +0200
> >
> >
> >>On one of my production machine, tcp_statistics was sitting in a heavily
> >>modified cache line, so *every* SNMP update h
David S. Miller a écrit :
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 03:07:06 +0200
On one of my production machine, tcp_statistics was sitting in a heavily
modified cache line, so *every* SNMP update had to force a reload.
But I disagree that statistics belong in the __r
33 matches
Mail list logo
