Re: [Nepomuk] Questions about Nepomuk Core

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:53 AM, David Narvaez wrote: > Hi, > > I have tried to follow the thread about the Nepomuk situation but > can't figure out answers to these questions now that I'm working on > Activities and Nepomuk to fix the Icons/Ontologies tragedy: > > 1) When will Nepomuk Core replac

[Nepomuk] Questions about Nepomuk Core

2012-05-16 Thread David Narvaez
Hi, I have tried to follow the thread about the Nepomuk situation but can't figure out answers to these questions now that I'm working on Activities and Nepomuk to fix the Icons/Ontologies tragedy: 1) When will Nepomuk Core replace kde-runtime's Nepomuk services and stuff? KDE 4.9? 2) Nepomuk Cor

[Nepomuk] Review Request: Signal the End of Ontology Loading on DBus

2012-05-16 Thread David Narváez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104970/ --- Review request for Nepomuk. Description --- Port of review request 10

Re: [Nepomuk] Review Request: Signal the End of Ontology Loading on DBus

2012-05-16 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104964/#review13900 --- This review has been submitted with commit 007b17de0a2e8c0116f

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 09:52 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > > > On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg >

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > > On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg > > wrote: > > > > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > > > Feel free to imple

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch > might at least

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch > might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing. > If you do not I would appreciate a

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing. If you do not I would appreciate a look over my branch to check if I missed sth. Cheers, Sebastian O

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 08:37 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > > > Or since those are just APIs

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait. > > I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. > The facets are qu

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait. I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. The facets are quite weird and I am not sure about releasing them again. The ui stuff -

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? Or since those are just APIs they can wait. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I now prepared the required repositories: > > scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio > contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves > > scratch/trueg/nep

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
I now prepared the required repositories: scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-config contains the KCM and the controller systray app The question is: where should we move them? Something like "KDE/Base"? I suppose questions like these hav

Re: [Nepomuk] Review Request: Signal the End of Ontology Loading on DBus

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trueg
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104964/#review13880 --- Ship it! Looks good. But we need a patch for nepomuk-core inde