On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait.
I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. The facets are quite weird and I am not sure about releasing them again. The ui stuff - not sure. > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg <tr...@kde.org > <mailto:tr...@kde.org>> wrote: > > I now prepared the required repositories: > > scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio > contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves > > scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-config > contains the KCM and the controller systray app > > The question is: where should we move them? Something like "KDE/Base"? > I suppose questions like these have already been discussed with respect > to KDE5? > > Cheers, > Sebastian > > On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > On 05/07/2012 03:47 PM, ivan.cu...@gmail.com > <mailto:ivan.cu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Maybe there could be something like qt has - > BEGIN_NEPOMUK_NAMESPACE... So that if the same needs to be done in > the future, we could just change the macro value. > > > > That would be much more work since each cpp file has the namespaces in > > the method definitions. > > > >> I don't know, thinking that Nepomuk2 namespace is looking rather > ugly :) > > > > it is indeed. > > > >> The dirtiest solution library-wise would be to have everything in > NepomukCore::Nepomuk::Something so that the only change in the > current code of nepomuk users would be a using namespace NepomukCore; > >> > >> Sorry for being a bit vague, I'm writing from my phone. > >> > >> Cheerio, > >> IvanOn 7.5.12. 14.49 Vishesh Handa wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg <tr...@kde.org > <mailto:tr...@kde.org>> wrote: > >> > >> On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg <tr...@kde.org > <mailto:tr...@kde.org> > >> > >>> <mailto:tr...@kde.org <mailto:tr...@kde.org>>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > >>> > >>> > So, we're down to 3 options - > >>> > > >>> > *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs. Kdelibs > is not > >>> touched. > >>> > *Problem:* Overlapping headers and possible mysterious > crashes if both > >>> > libraries are loaded. > >>> > > >>> > *2.* nepomuk-core installs headers under nepomuk2. It's > released > >>> > independently. > >>> > *Problem:* Mysterious crashes if both libraries are loaded. > >>> > > >>> > *3.* nepomuk-core installs headers under nepomuk2 and the > namespace is > >>> > changed to nepomuk2. > >>> > *Problem:* A lot more work :( > >>> > >>> Well, I suppose we could make this work with some sed magic. :P > >>> I would vote for option 3 which could then be reverted (or > not) for > >>> kde5. > >>> > >>> > >>> I would prefer option 2. > >>> > >>> The mysterious crashes would only happen if an application's plugin > >>> links to the incorrect libraries. > >>> > >>> Is that a possibility for us? > >> > >> > >> I already experienced that. Took me a while to find the reason. > >> > >> > >> Alright. > >> > >> I would like the Nepomuk2 namespace and include directories be > removed for the frameworks, but I guess it is not a big deal if that > doesn't happen. > >> > >> ---- > >> > >> Okay, everyone. This is the point where you chime in and say - > "We're okay with this" or you raise your objections. We would like > to get this mess sorted in time for the 4.9 release. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Nepomuk mailing list > > Nepomuk@kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk@kde.org> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > Nepomuk@kde.org <mailto:Nepomuk@kde.org> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > > > > > -- > Vishesh Handa > _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list Nepomuk@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
