RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-24 Thread Anderson, Kelly
> From: Troy Laurin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I guess what I'm saying is that an "intermediate" file is > somewhat open > > to interpretation. > > I'd define a derived (intermediate) file as any file that can be > completely generated from some tool based on other files under source > con

Re: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-23 Thread Troy Laurin
On 10/21/05, Anderson, Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. So here's a middle ground question. Say that you have a code > generation scheme that generates source files from say an Excel > spreadsheet using templates (like CodeSmith), then those files are > compiled. If the generated source files

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-20 Thread Anderson, Kelly
> From: Troy Laurin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 10/20/05, Anderson, Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As a follow up question though... about the "clean" target, does the > > clean target typically delete the source files so that they > have to be > > retrieved from revision control by s

Re: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-19 Thread Troy Laurin
On 10/20/05, Anderson, Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a follow up question though... about the "clean" target, does the > clean target typically delete the source files so that they have to be > retrieved from revision control by scratch, or just the obj, lib, exe > and other intermediate fi

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-19 Thread Anderson, Kelly
I think you have made a very persuasive argument here for doing a clean every time. I'm not worried about how long the unit tests take to run, since we don't have any yet ;-) sad but true. As a follow up question though... about the "clean" target, does the clean target typically delete the source

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-19 Thread Evans, Jonathan (2)
#x27; Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools Getting a little off topic, but you mentioned using the script as documentation: >> Indeed, a reasonably well written NAnt script could even (with a small >> stretch of imagination) be considered to be the docum

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-19 Thread Ryan Davis
half Of Troy Laurin Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 8:35 PM To: Anderson, Kelly Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Install Tools On 10/18/05, Anderson, Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you just expect the tools to be installed, then you have a job > setting

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-19 Thread Crowhurst,Christian
location of the NAnt.exe that it has just retrieved along with the solution. Hope this explanation helps. Christian -Original Message- From: Anderson, Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 October 2005 18:23 To: Crowhurst,Christian Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools There&#

Re: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-18 Thread Troy Laurin
On 10/18/05, Anderson, Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you just expect the tools to be installed, then you have a job > setting up a new machine, virtual machine or whatever. If you do this > often, it might be worth automating, and it might be as easy to write a > NAnt script to do this as t

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-18 Thread Vamsi Atluri
Has anyone created an automated build that compiles BizTalk dlls. I have scripted something for MS Commerces server using Nants Solution Task to build a .csproj file. Similarly I would like to know if there is a way to build a .btproj file. I run into the following error: Unknown pro

Re: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-18 Thread Brass Tilde
> I have to admit a real lack of knowledge on Cruise Control (is there a > CC list?) Yes, at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ccnet-user. > Do you install from a network share? If you have the tools in > a revision control system, then you need revision control installed to > get goin

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-18 Thread Anderson, Kelly
net > Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools > > The middle way works well on one of our servers. > > We didn't want to build on every change, so we set up a > separate cruise > project that monitors the build tools separately from the code builds. > It's sche

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-18 Thread Brough, Nicolas (Contractor)
The middle way works well on one of our servers. We didn't want to build on every change, so we set up a separate cruise project that monitors the build tools separately from the code builds. It's scheduled to run at the end of the day, and it installs all updated tools when it spots a change.

RE: [Nant-users] Install Tools

2005-10-18 Thread Crowhurst,Christian
I think it may come as a surprise how many occasions you might make use of a separate script that setup the build environment: - re-creating an old build - setting up a new machine - disaster recovery tests and (heaven forbid) the real deal - an actual disaster - the next team in the organisation