RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt conditional execution of targets

2004-12-04 Thread Randy Regnier
> >>Sure - of course breaking compatibility is a bad thing generally - > >>however in this case I think there are probably more users who are > >>frustrated/confused by the current behaviour than are > >>actively relying > >>on it. I could be wrong though - I'd love to get peoples > >>opinions on t

Re: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt conditional execution of targets

2004-12-03 Thread Ian MacLean
Gert Driesen wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yes and as I pointed out - that can be done with: ie the dependencies set the value of foo-exists. Yes, ofcourse. If your first use-case is that common, then how come it has taken several yea

[Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt conditional execution of targets

2004-12-03 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'Troy Laurin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'J. Christopher Six'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault durin