> >>Sure - of course breaking compatibility is a bad thing generally -
> >>however in this case I think there are probably more users who are
> >>frustrated/confused by the current behaviour than are
> >>actively relying
> >>on it. I could be wrong though - I'd love to get peoples
> >>opinions on t
Gert Driesen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
yes and as I pointed out - that can be done with:
ie the dependencies set the value of foo-exists.
Yes, ofcourse.
If your first use-case is that common, then how come it has taken several
yea
- Original Message -
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Troy Laurin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'J. Christopher Six'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault durin