> >>Sure - of course breaking compatibility is a bad thing generally - > >>however in this case I think there are probably more users who are > >>frustrated/confused by the current behaviour than are > >>actively relying > >>on it. I could be wrong though - I'd love to get peoples > >>opinions on this. > >> > >> > > > >Yeah, me too. I have no problem with this change, if our user base (and not > >just one or two persons) agrees its for the best, and if the Ant developers > >only implemented it like this because they do not have an expression system.
>From one of the 'user base'... When I first tried it my intuition was that the dependencies would not be run along with the main target if the condition failed, so I was surprised (read: disappointed) to see them get called. I would be happy to see them not get run when the condition fails. Randy ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
