RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt conditional execution of targets

2004-12-04 Thread Randy Regnier
> >>Sure - of course breaking compatibility is a bad thing generally - > >>however in this case I think there are probably more users who are > >>frustrated/confused by the current behaviour than are > >>actively relying > >>on it. I could be wrong though - I'd love to get peoples > >>opinions on t

Re: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt conditional execution of targets

2004-12-03 Thread Ian MacLean
Gert Driesen wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yes and as I pointed out - that can be done with: ie the dependencies set the value of foo-exists. Yes, ofcourse. If your first use-case is that common, then how come it has taken several yea

[Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt conditional execution of targets

2004-12-03 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'Troy Laurin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'J. Christopher Six'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Re: Segfault durin

RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt

2003-07-21 Thread rbraswell
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt Hmm. I guess I have some more homework to do. I am not familiar with Mono. I'll have to check it out.   Thanks to all for the information! I may have some more questions soon.   Ryan -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

Re: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt

2003-07-21 Thread Berin Loritsch
Erv Walter wrote: How will you be "porting" your .NET code to Linux and Mac? Mono? If so, Nant works on Linux with Mono today, and I assume it would work on Mac as well as soon as Mono works on Mac (if it doesn't already). The main difference between Nant and Ant is what tasks are available

RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt

2003-07-21 Thread Erv Walter
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt How will you be "porting" your .NET code to Linux and Mac?  Mono?  If so, Nant works on Linux with Mono today, and I assume it would work on Mac as well as soon as Mono works on Mac (if it doesn't already).   The main difference between

RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt

2003-07-21 Thread rbraswell
Title: RE: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt At the moment we use MS Dev 6.0, but we will be converting to .Net soon. Our product line is currently windows only, but we intend to port to Linux and Mac in the near future. I don't yet know what the development environment will look like at that

Re: [Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt

2003-07-18 Thread Ian MacLean
Depends on your development environment. If you will be doing a significant amount of java development then Ant is what you're after. For .net development NAnt is a better choice. Does multi-platform mean gcc or higher level languages like java, c# or python ? Ian Hi, I'm trying to decide wh

[Nant-users] Ant vs. NAnt

2003-07-18 Thread rbraswell
Title: Ant vs. NAnt Hi, I'm trying to decide whether to use Ant or NAnt as my new build tool. My company is currently a Windows only shop, but we plan to go multi-platform(Mac\Linux\Win) in the next several months. Any thoughts? Thanks, Ryan